ypis

ypis t1_isjcljr wrote

Ok let's be clear: generally an increase in GDP per capita does NOT result in a decrease in suicide rate.

You claim it does in your post title and your claim is wrong based on the very plot you present.

If I read this correctly, I seem to appreciate your plot more than you do yourself.

I'm not saying a linear regression of form y = kx+ b would be anyhow appropriate or correct as an explanatory model for the presented factors. Your very data again shows it would not be suitable for a multitude of reasons. But what a linear fit of the aforementioned form WOULD demonstrate together with some statistical measures is that your statement in the title is false.

You cannot save the issue with any other pattern recognition either. You can see that generally, your x axis does not work as a sufficient predictor of y axis, especially not in the sense you suggest. You need at least some additional factor/variable to build a model that reaches reasonable explanatory power for your y axis.

1

ypis t1_isiq95k wrote

u/ankuprk you make one interpretation out of this data and you fail with that. Fit a line into your data and you will see that generally an increase in GDP per capita does NOT result in a decrease in suicide rates.

I really wonder why these posts get upvotes.

1