yourself88xbl
yourself88xbl t1_iyi22z1 wrote
I think what is so important about this experiment is the connection it makes between general relativity and quantum mechanics but I could be misinterpreting.
yourself88xbl t1_ity24dk wrote
Reply to comment by ersatz83 in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
>ANY statement about the relationship between science and understanding the human experience is ultimately metaphysical speculation, including this one.
That most certainly makes sense to me.
yourself88xbl t1_itvtyc1 wrote
Reply to comment by ersatz83 in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
I may be reaching here but doesn't quantum mechanics exist because you can make much more accurate models of the universe if you build the model on the basis that there isn't much that really is verifiable or falsifiable.
yourself88xbl t1_itvr282 wrote
Reply to Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Is there someone that can trim the fat for me here I'm having a hard time digesting this article.
yourself88xbl t1_j9hu4q8 wrote
Reply to I turned my 6XX into a weighted blanket by GHOSTVIPERZ28
r/tihi