wtfburritoo

wtfburritoo t1_j60qko4 wrote

So, what...? I guess there's a push to replace the term "homeless" with "unsheltered" now? Like that's supposed to somehow dress up the situation and be less offensive or some shit. Seems like another dumbass push by the social justice police to replace a word whose literal definition fits the use case, with one that vaguely fits but somehow seems less offensive because it's new. Then in 5 years, "unsheltered" will be considered offensive, and we'll have to figure out some new dumbass term, like "residence-challenged."

−8

wtfburritoo t1_j5uywaj wrote

The manufacturers who can actually sell new cars with aligned body panels, no parts missing or loose, and no leaks in either the passenger or storage compartments. Also, the same manufacturers that actually address and correct problems like those you mentioned, instead of trying to sweep shit under the rug and hide actual data on their vehicles and mystical self-driving software.

2

wtfburritoo t1_itep5fd wrote

This is normal for any property dispute, the restraining order will likely remain in place until it's settled in court. Adverse possession is common, but in this situation, if they haven't actually been paying taxes on the additional 2,000 sq. ft. of property, and all of the previous owners of your lot have been, then I'd say they don't have a leg to stand on. Then again, that depends on state law and whatever the judge decides.

2