vwturbo
vwturbo t1_jcbjvzv wrote
Reply to comment by schillerstone in What is the deal with the NH grid? by decayo
The savings on maintenance and repairs over the life of the facilities are, generally, much less than the difference in initial construction costs.
There are also maintenance costs associated with buried infrastructure that you are not acknowledging. Drastic changes in temperature, tree roots, flooding, damage from animals, damage from vehicles, etc, all cause damaged conduit and/or damaged cable, which is usually costly and disruptive to repair. Above-ground facilities are obviously way more exposed and therefore damaged more often, but the repairs are generally relatively inexpensive and simple compared to repairs of UG facilities.
vwturbo t1_jc7nptw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What is the deal with the NH grid? by decayo
I’m not saying change is bad lol. It’s obvious our existing system needs help. I’m saying that better tree trimming and maintenance, and more resilient above-ground infrastructure is almost always going to be a better and more cost effective solution for NH than burying cables will be on a large scale.
vwturbo t1_jc6oaol wrote
Reply to comment by futureygoodness in What is the deal with the NH grid? by decayo
As someone who works in the industry, it gets old hearing that we should just bury the lines. This works in dense areas, but for rural areas (like the vast majority of NH) it is extremely cost prohibitive. Installing buried conduit, manholes, transformer foundations, etc. is often upwards of $200-$300 per FOOT of buried conduit. Even more expensive if it has to be concrete-encased, or God forbid there is ledge (rock) in the way that needs to be hammered out (btw this is New Hampshire, the Granite State, there is ledge absolutely EVERYWHERE). And that doesn't even include the cost of installing (pulling, splicing) the actual cables and transformers themselves.
vwturbo t1_iz56rw0 wrote
Reply to comment by Ergotnometry in Anybody else hoping Market Basket comes to Vermont? by Unique-Public-8594
MB is not a national chain though. It's headquarters are in Mass and they only operate in the New England area.
vwturbo t1_jcbljau wrote
Reply to comment by Jrzgrl1119 in What is the deal with the NH grid? by decayo
I'm intrigued by this. Not sure why you're being downvoted.
This is just speculation, but from what limited knowledge I have about Alaska, even though it is not densely populated overall people tend to live in villages somewhat close to each other, correct? Even if a town only has a couple hundred people, if they all live relatively nearby to one another in a village, buried lines would make sense.
Another possible reason, response to downed lines is probably much more expensive and time consuming in such a large and remote area, so the larger upfront cost to bury lines may pay off quicker than in a smaller state like NH.
Are most long-distance transmission lines buried up there? Or just the distribution infrastructure that goes from building to building?