velvetshark
velvetshark t1_jc29lhx wrote
Reply to comment by JamesTiberiusCrunk in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Also, the dry cleaner lost it's conservation battle, from what I last read (article from 2022), so why can't they tear it down?
velvetshark t1_jc29er5 wrote
Reply to comment by JamesTiberiusCrunk in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
...no, it was a genuine question. The only thing I found out about the dry cleaner was that it was an example of a particular type of architecture and there was controversy about preserving it. Do you have a link to the article talking about apartments?
velvetshark t1_jc25uuw wrote
Reply to comment by JamesTiberiusCrunk in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
So what housing will be placed where the dry cleaner was?
velvetshark t1_jbt1gnf wrote
Reply to comment by vpi6 in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
Your comment is a little disengenuous, if this is the structure you're referring to. It's not just a "dry cleaner", it's a great and preserved example of a type.of architecture. This is "not in the name of stopping development". You may not agree with the reason, but it's not to "stop development at any cost". https://montgomeryplanning.org/blog-design/2011/03/building-of-the-month/
velvetshark t1_jc2x169 wrote
Reply to comment by JamesTiberiusCrunk in Developers who destroyed historic Lancashire pub ordered to rebuild it by Mighty_L_LORT
thank you!