twilliwilkinsonshire
twilliwilkinsonshire t1_jc5it8t wrote
Reply to comment by xylopyrography in Chart: Clean energy to make up 84% of new US power capacity in 2023 by captainquirk
The chart has this caption right above it:
>Solar, wind, battery storage and nuclear make up 84% of utility-scale generating capacity planned to come online this year
So IMHO batteries should not be included.
twilliwilkinsonshire t1_jc44o03 wrote
There should be far more nuclear on that chart than there is and batteries shouldn't be included, they only shift capacity not generate more - unless somehow they are calculating the efficiency gain for solar which brings me to that question.. is this just total peak generation capacity? That is not a particularly accurate way to measure solar and wind... this feels like a nearly useless chart.
twilliwilkinsonshire t1_jc40evw wrote
Reply to comment by tristanjones in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
>legal
Correct, we need that tax revenue desperately. Demographics are destiny.
twilliwilkinsonshire t1_jc3zwwo wrote
Reply to comment by ThePurpleDuckling in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
It has not for years, look closer at that chart.. the income has been steadily slower pace than cost since 2009.
twilliwilkinsonshire t1_jcd023o wrote
Reply to I am worthy. [Image] by BodaciousRaven
Uhhhh no.
This isnt motivation, this is just selfworship. You should not be telling yourself that anything you want is correct.