throwawayzeezeezee
throwawayzeezeezee t1_jeava71 wrote
Reply to comment by izumi3682 in You Can Have the Blue Pill or the Red Pill, and We’re Out of Blue Pills - Yuval Harari on threats to humanity posed by AI by izumi3682
You misunderstand.
You typed up quite a large and thoughtful reply to a bot. The bot's post is what reads like dry toast without butter. I'm simply trying to help you not waste your time.
throwawayzeezeezee t1_jdtmyrx wrote
Reply to comment by izumi3682 in You Can Have the Blue Pill or the Red Pill, and We’re Out of Blue Pills - Yuval Harari on threats to humanity posed by AI by izumi3682
Comments that read like dry toast without butter are written by bots.
You would be behooved to learn that sooner rather than later.
throwawayzeezeezee t1_jegn972 wrote
Reply to Chat-GPT use case I thought of that could make a wonderful difference - Social Services by tDANGERb
Foster services aren't underserved because a lack of humans to do it, it's underserved because of a lack of interest in funding it. If 100 million goes to US fostering bureaucracy annually, and this proposed model of ChatGPT can do what you suggest at a 10th of the cost, then the budget will simply go down to 10 million.
Not even touching the myriad number of 'ifs' involved, not least witch is the propensity for automated systems to disproportionately marginalize minority and poor people.