throughawaeladdie
throughawaeladdie t1_ja6bbvq wrote
Reply to comment by KingRandomGuy in I shot over 3600 one-second exposures to get my sharpest image of a galaxy to date by J3RRYLIKESCHEESE
so if op had chosen to do 2 second exposures instead, the pre-stacked photos would have more noise right?
throughawaeladdie t1_ja6aykg wrote
Reply to comment by KntKoko in I shot over 3600 one-second exposures to get my sharpest image of a galaxy to date by J3RRYLIKESCHEESE
i definitely want to all of this sounds really interesting. thanks a lot for explaining
throughawaeladdie t1_ja3xcmo wrote
Reply to I shot over 3600 one-second exposures to get my sharpest image of a galaxy to date by J3RRYLIKESCHEESE
could someone explain how these exposures work? I'm not big on photography so i don't understand it very well but as far as i know, it's 1 second compressed into a single image and 3600 of those superimposed onto each other right?
throughawaeladdie t1_ja6fkcp wrote
Reply to comment by KingRandomGuy in I shot over 3600 one-second exposures to get my sharpest image of a galaxy to date by J3RRYLIKESCHEESE
ah i see where i went wrong. thanks for explaining this to me!