theyusedthelamppost

theyusedthelamppost t1_j6k51eg wrote

>I think the thing that aged the worst is Sam's lack of change over the course of the film.

It's a small-scoped movie that doesn't have enough spare time to tell more than one character's story. It has something to say about a character. I don't think it should be criticized for not having more to say about more characters.

Could it have been a better movie if it expanded the budget and extended the running time beyond 102 minutes to include more character development? Possibly. But Braff probably didn't have an extra million dollars laying around to make it happen. And I don't think he should be criticized for that.

4

theyusedthelamppost t1_j5vjxax wrote

>Amazon Prime, and Amazon owns MGM.

Amazon Prime is not the same thing as Amazon. Prime is just one of the services that Amazon sells. MGM+ is another.

Your question is like asking if you buy a Nissan Maxima why do you also not get a Nissan Murano. Just because you buy one product with the word Nissan in the name doesn't mean you get every product that company makes.

0

theyusedthelamppost t1_j5vbhw1 wrote

>Is POI good good or like, good for a procedural good?

It's half of the best of both worlds.

If you're a boomer who likes your comfortable procedurals, the latter parts of the show might seem to "drift into the weeds" going deeper down the rabbit hole into complex hard sci-fi concepts about AI.

If you're a Severance fan who wants that deep, hard sci-fi packaged concisely, then you might feel bogged down having to sit through 103 episodes of procedurals to "get to the point".

It tries to be both and succeeds more than it fails. Some of the seemingly-one-off characters end up popping back up and joining the serialized story.

The show aired from 2011-2016, just when our appetites were changing.

All in all, I'd say that the show is a bit like eating ribs. It's too much effort for too little meat, but there's no denying that the meat you get is damn good. But if you're a nut for AI plotlines and feel the need to consume them all, then I'd say PoI is worth the effort.

2

theyusedthelamppost t1_j2l9u1l wrote

I liked watching each new episode of Better Call Saul as it aired. That way I could keep up with the discussion on social media when other were watching it and avoid spoilers. I heard a bunch of complaints about AMC+ so I'm glad I didn't have to deal with that.

Same situation with live sports. I'm not sure what packages exist to watch game in real time, but watching live in satellite works fine for me.

2

theyusedthelamppost t1_j2l84yw wrote

>How any one watches commercial TV anymore is beyond me.

one way is DVR (fast forward through commercials)

another way is when I have something to do on commercials (food, bathroom)

But just muting the TV during commercials isn't too bad. Even when streaming movies I have to keep the remote in my hand to micromanage the volume anyway. It's actually easier to manage the volume when watching satellite by comparison if I'm just muting commercials.

18

theyusedthelamppost t1_j2extrv wrote

I happen to agree with your sentiment which is, ironically, the reason why supporting Andor is so important to me.

A consumer's responsibility is to vote with his wallet. If we provide feedback to Disney that we don't want more of the crap that came before (prequels, boba fett, obiwan) but instead want more stuff like Andor, then we have a chance to turn the tide.

1

theyusedthelamppost t1_j2exgew wrote

I agree with you. If the show had found a way to introduce Dedra and Mon Mothma in the pilot, it would catch people more easily. It's odd for a show to wait until the 4th episode to introduce the two best main characters.

In fact, I'll go one step further and say that Mon Mothma should have been a co-lead of the series with her name and face equal to Cassian in the marketing. That would have better communicated to people what kind of show it is.

−5