tbdw
tbdw t1_j636mlt wrote
In the country (as opposed to the city) everybody knows what everybody's doing, there are always a ton of witnesses, who went to whom, who sleeps with whom and so on. If Sir Henry died anywhere near the Stapleton house let alone in it, the latter would be the primary suspect and even the lack of evidence due to rudimentary forensic expertise in Victorian England mightn't be able to save him. And sure the truth that Stapleton is Baskerville would be uncovered and after that any body of jurors would send his ass straight to the gallows.
As for the trouble of using the dog, see it that way: it worked once, it may well work twice, makes perfect sense.
tbdw t1_j636191 wrote
Reply to comment by ricarleite2 in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
He came to Devonshire already planning to acquire the estate one way or the other, that is why he introduced his wife as his sister. He wasn't sure of the actual method yet but then he had heard about Sir Charles frail heart and his belief in the hound.
When Henry appeared he decided to try the same method since it worked for the first time, that makes perfect sense.
Also, I'm not sure about constant beatings, where did you take it from?
tbdw t1_j634wh1 wrote
Reply to What are some good romance books? by Mrereren
In Anna Karenina Levin and Kitty line is pretty romantic and ends in a happy marriage. Sure, there are a few unsuccessful romantic lines there, but they can be happily ignored.
tbdw t1_j5stl19 wrote
Reply to comment by LuckElectronic in Which is the toughest book you have read? by LuckElectronic
Too late, bro
tbdw t1_j5lg005 wrote
Anna Karenina, obviously.
tbdw t1_j63c2he wrote
Reply to comment by ricarleite2 in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
I do remember that she feared him immensely and that he tied her at the end but extensive physical abuse I don't recall. Maybe I'm mistaken, it was quite a while since I read the book the last time.