I don't entirely agree with this point. If one uses AI to think for you, then it's actually the AI thinking and not you. Using the AI, you actually have to be good at those skills already. We had a web dev at work who used an AI writer to make copyright for an email blast and what he submitted to was SO bad, but he was so proud of himself. He didn't see what was wrong because his writing skills were very weak. And I'm no F. Scott Fitzgerald, but it was horrific trying to edit it, how can one not see the mistakes if one does not even understand?
In math, they still teach you the formula first and teachers have you write out your steps before you jump in to use a calculator. There was a fundamental skill and basis training first.
But I can see either way, adaptation to ai learning will be in high school and college will manifest, but I don't see in primary school.
tanzerdragoon t1_j1utmrn wrote
Reply to comment by Gagarin1961 in AI and education by lenhoi
I don't entirely agree with this point. If one uses AI to think for you, then it's actually the AI thinking and not you. Using the AI, you actually have to be good at those skills already. We had a web dev at work who used an AI writer to make copyright for an email blast and what he submitted to was SO bad, but he was so proud of himself. He didn't see what was wrong because his writing skills were very weak. And I'm no F. Scott Fitzgerald, but it was horrific trying to edit it, how can one not see the mistakes if one does not even understand?
In math, they still teach you the formula first and teachers have you write out your steps before you jump in to use a calculator. There was a fundamental skill and basis training first.
But I can see either way, adaptation to ai learning will be in high school and college will manifest, but I don't see in primary school.