sweatierorc
sweatierorc t1_jeamh38 wrote
Reply to comment by TruckNuts_But4YrBody in LAION launches a petition to democratize AI research by establishing an international, publicly funded supercomputing facility equipped with 100,000 state-of-the-art AI accelerators to train open source foundation models. by BananaBus43
It will probably be funded by billionaire philanthropists and large corporations. I could see Nvidia using this as a way to promote their GP. Musk or Zuck could use it for PR. Even Gates may drop a buck, just to act like he actually cares.
sweatierorc t1_je2ojvh wrote
Reply to Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
We don't know. There is a chance that singularity is actually super lame.
sweatierorc t1_jdszzh4 wrote
Reply to comment by rya794 in [P] Using ChatGPT plugins with LLaMA by balthierwings
Firefox did, they only lost to another "open-source" project
sweatierorc t1_jdmkacg wrote
Reply to comment by SmLnine in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
Sure, humans under 40 are also very resistant to cancer. My point was that cancer comes with old age, and aging seems to be a way for us to die before cancer or dementia kill us. There are "weak" evidence that people who have dementia are less likely to get a cancer. I understand that some mammals like whales or elephant seems to be very resistant to cancer, but if we were to double or triple their average life expectancy, other disease may become more prevalent, maybe even cancer.
sweatierorc t1_jdmilbm wrote
Reply to comment by Art10001 in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
Do we know that ? E.g. with quantum computing, we know that it won't really revolutionize our lives despite the fact that it can solve a new class of problem.
sweatierorc t1_jdm83bv wrote
Reply to comment by SmLnine in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
which one ? do they not get cancer or are they more resistant to it ?
sweatierorc t1_jdlhgay wrote
Reply to comment by SmLnine in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
IMHO, I think that cancer and aging are necessary for complex organism. It is more likely that we solve cloning or build the first in vitro womb, than we are at deafeating cancer or aging.
sweatierorc t1_jdlcwkm wrote
Reply to comment by t0slink in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
True, but with AI more computing power/data means better models. With medicine, things move slower. If we get a cure for one or two cancer this decade, it would be a massive achievement.
sweatierorc t1_jdkt9uq wrote
Reply to comment by t0slink in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
A cure for cancer and aging in this decade. AI has gotten really good, but let's not get carried away.
sweatierorc t1_jdfwmee wrote
Reply to comment by zxyzyxz in [D] What is the best open source chatbot AI to do transfer learning on? by to4life4
What about BLOOM ?
sweatierorc t1_jdfwh5f wrote
Reply to comment by wendten in [D] What is the best open source chatbot AI to do transfer learning on? by to4life4
LLama is not open-source (though it is gratis).
Edit: typo
sweatierorc t1_jcjv2g4 wrote
Reply to [D] GPT-4 is really dumb by [deleted]
"hype is a hell of a drug", rick james
sweatierorc t1_jcbg3ki wrote
Reply to comment by wywywywy in [D] What do people think about OpenAI not releasing its research but benefiting from others’ research? Should google meta enforce its patents against them? by [deleted]
But if they stop publishing, it will hurt adoption, SD1.5 has became the benchmark of txt2img models over dalle-2 or more recent SD models.
Another thing to consider is that not publishing will hurt recruitment. Character.ai founders left google to build their own company after working on Lamda.
sweatierorc t1_jc3ruox wrote
Reply to comment by Maximus-CZ in [R] Stanford-Alpaca 7B model (an instruction tuned version of LLaMA) performs as well as text-davinci-003 by dojoteef
Squeeze that paper
sweatierorc OP t1_j9xpbgr wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Does the concept of consent apply to chatbot like chatgpt ? by sweatierorc
This is the video game view, basically, you can run over pedestrian since they are not "real" even if they express pain and suffering.
sweatierorc OP t1_j9xnafq wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Does the concept of consent apply to chatbot like chatgpt ? by sweatierorc
you can design them to be very emotional.
Submitted by sweatierorc t3_11bf8ut in singularity
sweatierorc t1_j854tn3 wrote
Reply to comment by goj-145 in [D] Is it legal to use images or videos with copyright to train a model? by Tlaloc-Es
On the training part, it is probably legal, though you need to be careful about something like GDPR. E.g. for facial recognition, there are extra rules.
The "sharing model and/or its prediction" is the gray area.
Edit:t ypo
sweatierorc t1_j1t4eja wrote
Reply to comment by TonyTalksBackPodcast in I created an AI to replace Fox and CNN by redditguyjustinp
There is a big difference between covering news and past events. Look at how WikiLeaks change the 2016 election.
sweatierorc t1_jegm93d wrote
Reply to comment by ktpr in [P] Introducing Vicuna: An open-source language model based on LLaMA 13B by Business-Lead2679
*insert if they could read meme*