supermechace

supermechace t1_itn912w wrote

That's correct thats why they had trouble pinning anyything on him, if the accused(according to his testimony) just shrugged off a taser and knocked down a cop, adrenaline will kick in and you'll use enough force to make sure the accused stay down. Though with body cams he implied they'll just ignore possible criminals as they'll be judged unfairly for protecting themselves from harm.

−3

supermechace t1_itmsju0 wrote

Article doesn't make clear if arrests were justified or not(false arrests, cop planted evidence on victim etc). Excessive force is able to be excused away by saying he was apprehended violent criminals who were resisting and even knocking out cops which the article supports his statements. Article is a little odd as it seems to provide more evidence to defend/justify his position

−2

supermechace t1_itmr4st wrote

To be honest the article doesn't clarify if he made false arrests or other than the protesters(not states if it was the throw stuff or charge at copy's type) beat people that weren't resisting. Not that excessive force is justified but if he's able to prove it's mainly in the heat of the moment where the suspect is violently fighting back in dangerous neighborhoods I can see how they can't find justification for harsher charges.

−1