supermechace

supermechace t1_jeg6huj wrote

This particular scenario would be up to the person whether through demanding better pay, quitting, or unionize. I think the bigger issue is long term NYC residents being pushed out of their neighborhoods. In a capitalist society that's hard to prevent but ideally people would profit from the sales of their homes and use it to move to lower costs areas appropriate for them and their fiances. Unfortunately the answer for that in many cases is outside NYC like Florida.

1

supermechace t1_je9d2tz wrote

It's not as black and white as that, as NYC used to have a range of housing at affordable price points relative to your position, giving a lot of immigrants their head start. But the acceleration of people being priced out of the neighborhoods and communities they grew up occured while wages were pushed down. Overall homeownership in America is low thanks to the govt bailing out in 08 the very wall street companies that caused the crash instead of the builders and mortgage companies supporting lower income ranges. So now you've got NYC families being pushed out. A bigger issue for families on the lower income scale as picking up and moving to low cost states to compete with existing residents for low skill jobs is probably not practical. NY govt fails to do any long term planning and relies on "private sector" leadership which means no one will build low cost housing unless they make a lot of money. Affordable housing solution is to sprawl out to surrounding areas but that was already done with NYCers moving to NJ and transit infrastructure built. Now there's little political will for the effort to sprawl upstate.

2

supermechace t1_je6p9p0 wrote

I think six figures is a bit of an exaggeration as theres more affordable housing (or arrangements like room mates )further out from Manhattan. But big corps can find ways to fill the void like packaged food prepared off site or in ghost kitchens. McDonald's is researching robotics and already has self serve kiosks

0

supermechace t1_je5dj9g wrote

I have a theory that much of current American capitalism is finding ways to shift costs(including labor and time) to someone else. I would say current crisis has been brewing partly because employers were able to get away with low salaries and benefits for a long time. The resulting consequences of people being priced out causing homelessness was shifted to tax payers to pay for homeless shelters. NYC politicians talk a lot about affordable housing but ultimately fail to enact anything and keep leaning on private sector solutions because they're backed by real estate industry yet propped up by property tax revenue. Unfortunately in this musical chairs of shifting responsibility and costs it's hard to see a solution. If govt services collapse the govt might resort to outsourcing complete depts

1

supermechace t1_jbh6an7 wrote

Not really it works out for the major voting blocs who can carve out favorable politicians and kickbacks. If you saw the quote I included just one NYC union I've never heard of out of hundreds, had over 160k members. Adams had the popular support of the majority of unions. A normal NYC middle class voter can't muster a voting bloc large enough to overcome established interests and party interests (which also get national backing and support). That's why independents can't gain any ground in NYC

5

supermechace t1_jbfwrl6 wrote

Also special interest include unions police, teachers, if you're not from NY you may not be aware that winning a union endorsement can guarantee you a election. quote "That’s why Adams can boast a long list of union endorsements including some of the most powerful in the city. He has been backed by 32BJ SEIU, the property services workers union with more than 160,000 members,"

2

supermechace t1_jbfuxft wrote

Actually it's the right to shelter law that the issue as these are asylum applicants that couldn't be deported anyway. Abbot is just harping to make a political point. Right to shelter has good intentions but should be tweaked to apply to NY residence only and everyone else a case by case basis

4

supermechace t1_ja45twm wrote

Not sure if they purposely doing these things vs symptoms of dysfunctional government. From what I understand it's basically down to the byzantine politics and dysfunctional infighting and competing priorities. One of the easiest issues to understand is from what I hear is the poor relationship between teachers and "management"(principles and DOE). Then the other is that DOE management doesn't appear to be a promote from within culture based on performance, the real decision makers are political appointments who basically redo everything from scratch when they're in. Maybe the best analogy is that the school system is as dysfunctional as the MTA except the definition of success is made even muddier. Then in my opinion I feel that the system has grown so big that more authority should be given to local schools and local elected officials. The DOE and political appointee are too far removed from the neighborhoods which are basically cities onto themselves population wise.

3

supermechace t1_ja43rc9 wrote

Not OP but I think charter schools in NYC are a makeshift bandaid and political bandaid to address the inability to meet the needs and wants by parents of schools due to bureaucracy, infighting withing government, competing politics and educational goals, and power of teacher unions. Basically similar to outsourcing govt services to outside companies (which has advantages of not being tied up in bureaucracy and plausible deniability if contractor messes up) but in this case the government maintains control of a competing service(public school vs outsourced charter school). The existence of charter schools is due to government and political dysfunction (which seems to be worsening in NYC) so unless those disappear charter schools aren't likely either. Also keep in mind there's a lot of tax payer money out there so everyone wants it to be used the way they want it to be used.

2

supermechace t1_j9fg6iz wrote

like anything it's usually a few bad apples that ruin things for everyone else. My friends elderly mom got hit by a car. Lawyer got her 60k plus hospital bills. If e vehicles are required to be insured it could also lead to the delivery services requiring only licensed vehicles be used and employers held liable or bikes confiscated for being unlicensed. Fake license plates is part of the general NYC police indifference which is impacting all crime levels but eventually politicians will get police to make this a priority again, I long island there are crack downs on fake paper plates from time to time. Unfortunately in the US only major fear of consequences motivate the bad actors

0

supermechace t1_j6yalnq wrote

There's other factors like need for population and labor pool growth that prevent politicians from being 100% against. The US should adopt a EU style approach to south America to control migration. EU still has refugees problems as it's connected to the rest of the world. But the Americas are separated by oceans so the main migration concern is limited

5