st0j3
st0j3 t1_ja8ep0i wrote
$40k sounds way too low. Are you buying 20% of a house or not? What happens when you sell? What happens if the house burns down and the insurance company writes a giant check?
st0j3 t1_j0v3tj4 wrote
You're asking a sub of car haters which car to get.
When I looked into EVs, I wasn't able to get on board and ended up getting another non-EV. For EV to work I feel you either need deeded parking or a convenient supercharger. I imagine public slow chargers would be annoying to consistently deal with.
st0j3 t1_ixjp7jt wrote
Reply to comment by BumCubble42069 in Brattle St Bike Lane by plantboy97
You're not wrong. If OP rear ended the car, OP is at fault.
st0j3 t1_iv2tni3 wrote
Reply to comment by coldsnap123 in Brattle Street bike lanes are being installed next week. by greemp
I think the general movement suffers from some flaws:
- Risk / safety are often assessed based on perception rather than evidence. Groups complain that they don't feel safe biking, and so push for action.
- Many bike advocates seem to believe zero risk / perfect safety is achievable, but it's not. Because they don't understand zero risk is an aspiration goal that isn't possible to actually achieve, I think there is no point at which they will be satisfied.
- There is a diminishing return on safety and increasing costs for each improvement. Bike advocates seem to not acknowledge the various types of inconveniences and other costs any (perceived) increase in safety they push for requires.
Don't get me wrong: There are good ideas that should be implemented. But there are also some really shit ideas that shouldn't be implemented under any conditions, as well as a point where biking is "safe enough".
st0j3 t1_jabsor5 wrote
Reply to comment by monsterzeno in Cambridge to Launch Universal Pre-K for Four-Year-Olds in Fall 2024 | News | The Harvard Crimson by b00gerbear
Childcare remains the same price, it just has been pushed onto those who don't have kids :/