st0j3

st0j3 t1_j0v3tj4 wrote

You're asking a sub of car haters which car to get.

When I looked into EVs, I wasn't able to get on board and ended up getting another non-EV. For EV to work I feel you either need deeded parking or a convenient supercharger. I imagine public slow chargers would be annoying to consistently deal with.

2

st0j3 t1_iv2tni3 wrote

I think the general movement suffers from some flaws:

  • Risk / safety are often assessed based on perception rather than evidence. Groups complain that they don't feel safe biking, and so push for action.
  • Many bike advocates seem to believe zero risk / perfect safety is achievable, but it's not. Because they don't understand zero risk is an aspiration goal that isn't possible to actually achieve, I think there is no point at which they will be satisfied.
  • There is a diminishing return on safety and increasing costs for each improvement. Bike advocates seem to not acknowledge the various types of inconveniences and other costs any (perceived) increase in safety they push for requires.

Don't get me wrong: There are good ideas that should be implemented. But there are also some really shit ideas that shouldn't be implemented under any conditions, as well as a point where biking is "safe enough".

−12