sonderlingg

sonderlingg t1_j63emap wrote

Yes. This scenario is the only positive future I can imagine.

Otherwise different minds would compete for resources to expand themselves.

Though we can't be sure that merging consciousness is possible in our universe.

People mostly get the idea wrong. Like they would be a small part in a controversial sea of typical human consciousness. No, everyone would be this united consciousness, and the experience is unimaginable even for those, who tried heroic doses of psychedelics.

0

sonderlingg OP t1_iv4g7ww wrote

Reply to comment by Dark-Arts in Merger of consciousnesses by sonderlingg

We don't yet know, how consciousness exists.
It's called "Hard problem of consciousness" for a reason.

AI may be conscious or not, with the same probability, it's literally 50/50 for us at the moment

1

sonderlingg OP t1_iv4f6jt wrote

Reply to comment by Taron221 in Merger of consciousnesses by sonderlingg

Well, imagine you are superintelligent. You can experience indescribable bliss every nanosecond. To which the best hallucinogen trips are nothing.

And you can expand this feeling even more, by using available resources.

Now imagine a second superingelligent being next to you, with the same goal.
And suppose that it is impossible for you two to merge

1

sonderlingg t1_iuc4r9e wrote

Just imagine how many people work on it. How they want to be the first to create AGI. And their number quickly increase.

Imagine how right now many new models are being trained on GPUs. Moore's law still works. Hardware becomes better and better.

We've already recreated many brain's algorithms (art, speech, face recognition, driving and many more). All that's left is to teach a machine how to learn by itself.

And by the way, we already can copy singer's voice, read other comments

1

sonderlingg t1_ity1nn6 wrote

Now think how many living things there are on Earth.

And how lucky you are just to be human, not some insect being eaten from the inside by parasitoid wasp's larva

Btw where did you get 0.07%? There were about 117 billion humans in total. So it makes 8/117 = ~6.83%

15

sonderlingg t1_itwraxw wrote

Reply to comment by solidh2o in ai psd files by mattdyer

Yeah i've worked in ableton and fl as well, and now i'm a programmer.

I just think it's hard, because there's no dataset.
Like you can't just write every musician "send us your DAW projects to train neural net"

2

sonderlingg t1_itvsxn2 wrote

Reply to ai psd files by mattdyer

Yeah, the same with music. It would be nice to train AI based on projects in DAWs, but i don't think it's possible

2