I think that's already happened.

Seems fun. I think actually having to have it recorded in real life would be a limiting factor. Other than that, fun experiment. I could see some type of animation doing stuff like this and then having a small team of artists touch it up and draw on top of it.

As far as actual anime production, I think in-betweeners and backgrounds will be the first things crushed by AI.

I'd be curious to see this applied to manga, given the limitations that already exists like no color, sound, movements, etc. Some of these things have multiple hundreds of issues, all drawn by the same person. An AI could probably be trained on both the literal "in the frame" stuff as well layouts.

Interesting times. I want to see the first voice actors and artists who model themselves and sell it. Those would be interesting business decisions to see play out.

Seems like a dumb ruling but at the same time it was like dumb for them to leave in the citation.

This wasn't academic research or some competitive writing task for money, fame, or professional validity. It was just a letter. I don't think you really need to cite sources in something like that. PR companies never get cited when they draft a letter or speech.

> However, without more information or context, it's difficult to determine Arnold's exact feelings towards the dog with certainty. It's possible that he might be surprised or even overwhelmed by the news, but his brief response of "Great" suggests that he is, at the very least, accepting of the new addition to his life.

That was my interpretation and I got response spammed that I don't understand humans.

Maybe so. I've totally used the word "great" to describe something that I thought was the textbook definition of the word great.

Nowhere in the text does it say that Bob only wears the shirt in front of Sandra. "Great!" is assumed to be bland an unenthusiastic but I'm not sure where that's coming from. There's no context provided as to Bob's response other than an exclamation point, which generally means the opposite of bland.

To it's credit, a lot of people would have thrown in their own biases and assumptions and heard what they wanted to hear as well.

The internet works for me. Maybe you don't know how to use it.

I bought a game called Octophath Traveler. I faced a tough enemy named Omar and died. I wanted to know how to beat him. I went to google and typed "Octopath Traveler Omar". The first result was was a wiki page about the character and the second result was a page with all of his weaknesses.

The internet works for me. I don't know what you all are doing to where you can never find anything that you search for but I can. You're probably an idiot or something.

The ads are labeled as ads and there is ad-blocker. When I search something, I usually get what I want in the first five results. Compare that to the 90s where I'd go pages deep or have to be like "I must be using the wrong terms"

I agree more with "changed" than "killed" as well. Maybe 80s internet was different but I've been online since the mid 1990s and that internet definitely wasn't killed.

Forums are still around (we're talking on one). Chat turned into social media. You can still learn things via websites. Search is infinitely better. I'm still able to post music online and get feedback from others. I'm not really sure what got killed. All the stuff I ever used the internet for is still around at either the same quality level or undeniably improved.