scottydg
scottydg t1_j9fkdmk wrote
Reply to comment by xixi2 in UK calls on IOC to maintain Olympic ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes by rejs7
It is. The President is the Commander in Chief, who outranks everyone in the military, orders them to do things, all that. Congress controls spending and has the exclusive right to declare "War", which the President then uses to act with more power than under normal circumstances.
scottydg t1_j9e0w7m wrote
Reply to comment by teabagmoustache in UK calls on IOC to maintain Olympic ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes by rejs7
Sure, which they're allowed to do that. These definitions of "War" can be wrong.
scottydg t1_j9d6ndx wrote
Reply to comment by Im2bored17 in UK calls on IOC to maintain Olympic ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes by rejs7
Exactly. There are limitations to what the President can do as the Commander in Chief, but sending troops to places within the restrictions of the defense budget or what Congress authorizes through what has lately been the AUMF (Authorization of Military Force). These things are not "War", however.
scottydg t1_j9d2inv wrote
Reply to comment by UrbanGhost114 in UK calls on IOC to maintain Olympic ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes by rejs7
If you want to get technical, the US has not been at "War" since WWII. They have been in numerous "Military conflicts" or "peacekeeping operations" or whatever you want to call them, but it's not "War".
scottydg t1_j9fklat wrote
Reply to comment by michael_harari in UK calls on IOC to maintain Olympic ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes by rejs7
Yep, I agree. There's a reason everyone was saying "the war in Afghanistan and Iraq", "Vietnam war", whatever you want to call those "conflicts", they were wars.