savageo6

savageo6 t1_jdsukgd wrote

That there is some exemplary self fellating projection.

So as someone else in this thread mentioned...both sides bad right? So you can just jabber on from the sidelines bitching about how everyone is trying to fuck all of us and do absolutely nothing about it.

Because my friend the truth is you nor I can't do a fucking thing about it. It's too deep into people who have pockets and influence deeper than either of us will likely ever truly know.

Are they both fucking people over to get theirs absolutely. But I also live in the real world outside your dystopian soliloquy. Our choice is between the GOP full of literal white supremacist christo fascists funded by fundamental billionaires who want everyone in the world to be subservient to them and have zero rights to be who they are or do what we want unless we're in their club, which we will never be.

Or the Democrats, now a right of center party full of old as fuck white dudes who want to maintain their status quo power funded by the largest corporations. They don't want to shake the boat and quickly suppress anybody even in their party who they see as that. But generally they let people go about their lives and have implemented some generally good social platforms in the past. Is the same corruption and bullshit there absolutely. But there's at least a slight glimmer of potential progress. There isn't anywhere else outside of violently tearing it ALL down and hoping whatever survives is an improvement.

So I support the side for what tiny sliver of impact I have in order to keep that slight glimmer of potential progress alive. Because if the GOP rolls back into complete control they'll NEVER give it up again because it's the only way they can stay in power. Then we'll see real complete dystopia...

5

savageo6 t1_jds766z wrote

Look at this cock gobbling whatsboutism. Everything you said has ZERO to fucking do with anything on this article. The federal government has ZERO jurisdiction over the enforcement of state and city laws. So they and you can get fucked chief. Who the DA is, that's completely unrelated to these GOP reps blatantly shitting on the constitution they seem to love

13

savageo6 t1_jds6euy wrote

Such a stupid argument, the GOP has done shit at the state and city level where they have legislative and judicial control. That the federally elected democratic government fundamentally disagrees with say voter ID laws. But you didn't have Democratic reps calling DAs or state legislature to piss and moan and say they have the right to stop it. Because they don't, they appeal the rulings to the higher courts. This is fascists covering for their fascist leader to save face until they see which way the primaries break. Then the rats will swim to the ship that isn't sinking like all of the Ted Cruz lackeys did in 2016

39

savageo6 t1_jds5px8 wrote

God the Post is a shit soaked rag. Listen to that Murdoch funded GOP gobbling tone. The DAs office is doing EXACTLY what they should be doing telling the house reps to get fucked. They have ZERO jurisdiction over a state/city case. States rights only apply when it applies only to guns and crushing the rights of minorities right conservatives?

35

savageo6 t1_j9tulpt wrote

Reply to comment by DeaHera in Proposing to SO in NYC by DeaHera

It's less of your photography skills and more of leaving a directly unattended what I assume is a few thousand dollars of camera equipment is a huge target for someone to grab and run off with it all

3

savageo6 t1_iyjo5ec wrote

And I'll state it again, slowly for you this time. The law creates a presumption of trafficking for certain threshold amounts, e.g. 30 grams of cannabis.

So if you have 31 grams on you you're now a trafficker of which hanging is the harshest possible penalty...so let's spend another 45mins arguing semantics you sentient potato...

1

savageo6 t1_iyjjy2k wrote

Or you can read something instead of attempting to be clever...

The law creates a presumption of trafficking for certain threshold amounts, e.g. 30 grams of cannabis. It also creates a presumption that a person possesses drugs if he possesses the keys to a premises containing the drugs, and that "Any person found in or escaping from any place or premises which is proved or presumed to be used for the purpose of smoking or administering a controlled drug shall, until the contrary is proved, be presumed to have been smoking or administering a controlled drug in that place or premises."

Just over an oz is enough to be convinced and executed. The threshold for trafficking is absolutely ridiculous and at their whim to make the case.

−12