sEi_

sEi_ t1_je93rsp wrote

Reply to [D] What do you think about all this hype for ChatGPT? by Dear-Vehicle-3215

Nobody knows what is going on. Not even the 'creators' so my input is same valid is everybody else.

And yes I see big paradigm shifts ahead, and some have already happened and is happening now. Concerning "people/work/etc.".

There is much debate and stuff to do.

But focus should imho be moved away from the AI technical side. Everybody now know that current large model AIs have some kind of power we can use/misuse. What power and how to use, we have to find out.

So we need to take the "thinking hat" on and more look at what kind of new society we want as there is a possibility that AI can help us change the society to the better or even the worse. Especially worse if big tech is allowed a monopoly on development and deployment. Anyway this monopoly is close to be nullified and 'they' are scared.

I am sure technological advances will soon make it possible to make/train/run big models like ChatGPT in a distributed network and when that is possible the monopoly is broken. It will happen and is only a matter of (short) time, and again they know that.

As of now the only 'power' big tech has is that they have the infrastructure to create/run big models. The technology and code is out in the open so the only thing is, they have 'a big file' and now let's earn billions on the 'sheep'.

The big money is earned on having the monopoly and lease access to other companies that then in turn have to earn the little money you can earn by offering paid inference to some 'inhouse' implementation.

If 'big tech' is the only jumping on the wagon we for sure get to keep status quo, where you work for some boss so he can get car number 3 or a villa somewhere.

I know most of you love money, depend on it and have "earning money" as a goal. But there is a possible life where money is obsolete and as useless as the paper or numbers that we adore as a deity.

Ye ye, you need to open your mind, but many do not and instead laugh at statements like above because they (not blaming) are so stuck in the dogma that they do not even dare to think of alternatives.

AI is not a goal, its a tool.

Now is a good occasion to revise some old and outdated ways of doing while the society is in front of big changes like now. No doubt about changes, but what kind of changes only time can tell.

Emancipate yourself. (nothing new there btw.)

−1

sEi_ t1_jdvi7f9 wrote

Reply to comment by ThePogromist in My ChatGPT Chrome Extension that saves conversations in .md files is finally approved by the Chrome Web Store. It's still and so will continue to be Open Source. [P] by ThePogromist

Try a search in any search engine for this: "Погромщик" or "ThePogromist" (OP's username).

You will not get any other definitions unless you specific ask for it by saying "jargon" or the like.

Why evade the fact that your username and you without reasonable doubt is glorifying the pogrom issue?

With a 5 day old reddit account, maybe ditch it and pick a more suitable name next time.

I mean no harm but your nick (still) worries me.

Btw. I can do GPT-4 too:

>The Russian word "погромщик" (pogromshchik) can be translated to English as "pogromist" or "rioter." It refers to someone who takes part in a pogrom, which is a violent attack or riot directed against a specific ethnic or religious group, often resulting in the destruction of property and the persecution or killing of individuals. Pogroms have historically been associated with the persecution of Jews in Eastern Europe, particularly in Russia and Ukraine.

3

sEi_ t1_jdvdr8j wrote

Reply to comment by ThePogromist in My ChatGPT Chrome Extension that saves conversations in .md files is finally approved by the Chrome Web Store. It's still and so will continue to be Open Source. [P] by ThePogromist

Sorry I do not read or understand Russian.

The username is not "jargonism" but "ThePogromist" that any search, in any search engine will return as the first response, namely the answer I posted, if they even tell about other definitions/meanings/jargons at all.

That the word in your world can have another meaning I can not see change anything in this sphere.

If you where aware of the official [english] interpretation when picking that nick, then it is still 'fishy' at least.

But whatever I'm not loosing sleep over this.

----

Or as my friend said (GPT word spew alert):

Prompt:

>What is the obvious interpretation of the username "ThePogromist" aka pogromist?

Response:

>The term "pogrom" refers to an organized, often officially encouraged massacre or persecution of a particular ethnic or religious group, particularly Jews. Historically, pogroms have occurred in various countries, most notably in Russia and Eastern Europe. The term "pogromist" would be someone who participates in or advocates for such violence or persecution.
>
>Given this context, the username "ThePogromist" carries a negative connotation, as it seems to imply an association with or endorsement of such violence and persecution. However, as mentioned earlier, it's important to keep in mind that people choose usernames for various reasons, and the intended meaning might not always align with the obvious interpretation.

2

sEi_ t1_jdh3kej wrote

Reply to comment by utopiah in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501

Per default when you close the session everything about it is forgotten when you have next session. (The past sessions will must certainly be used to train next version of GPT though)

1

sEi_ t1_jc6k44a wrote

Reply to [D] ChatGPT without text limits. by spiritus_dei

IMPORTANT

I see an influx of POSTS WITHOUT REFERENCES.

When you in the start say: "recently resolved by researchers" and I see no blue link I can check, then I scroll past the post.

And even "The paper..." many times. What paper?

I simply ignore posts like this. Life is too short to read peoples dreams.

EDIT:
When citing stuff please put the link in the body of the post. So I do not have to search for it down the thread.

4

sEi_ t1_jacieip wrote

Reply to Elon plans to build an OpenAI competitor by pyactee

Learn some journalistic ethics before relying on 'clickbait' titles, regurgitating stolen text and let Chad hallucinate on top.

101: References for ALL facts is a no brainer.

You want to be trustworthy or just another low effort AI blog for the sake of having an AI blog.

Now we got some nice tools, use them right. ffs

1

sEi_ t1_j50efga wrote

Reply to GPT-4 Will Be 500x Smaller Than People Think - Here Is Why by LesleyFair

About GPT-4 From the horses mouth:

Interview with Sam Altman (CEO OpenAI) from 2 days ago (17 jan).

Article in Verge:

>"OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on GPT-4: ‘people are begging to be disappointed and they will be’"

https://www.theverge.com/23560328/openai-gpt-4-rumor-release-date-sam-altman-interview

Video with the interview in 2 parts:

>StrictlyVC in conversation with Sam Altman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57OU18cogJI&ab_channel=ConnieLoizos

6

sEi_ t1_izypbyd wrote

Reply to comment by eigenman in [D] - Has Open AI said what ChatGPT's architecture is? What technique is it using to "remember" previous prompts? by 029187

The model is able to reference up to approximately 3000 words (or 4000 tokens) from the current conversation

I also had an adventure going and told that something should happen at 17:00 ingame time. Starting playing at 16:00 and 10min. increment each turn. And sure enough at 17:00 the thing i instructed in the initiating prompt happened.

1