ryumast3r
ryumast3r t1_je2h4zd wrote
Reply to comment by OOOOeeeAAAA in UPMC billed me for a stranger's appointment - has this happened to anyone else? by [deleted]
I am so sick of writing "Not at this address" on letters from the previous 10 people who lived at my address.
ryumast3r t1_j2cfzu9 wrote
Reply to comment by thunderbolt_alarm in Monthly D&D Campaigns at the Cat Lounge by thunderbolt_alarm
Awesome, thank you for the info!
ryumast3r t1_j2bbc1a wrote
This sounds great but do you have to show up every week? I move to pittsburgh on the 8th so wouldn't be able to join week 1.
ryumast3r t1_ivi2519 wrote
Reply to comment by rusty022 in Fetterman predicts early Republican lead in vote counting due to changes by GOP lawmakers | The Hill by oldschoolskater
38 of the 50 U.S. states (including the 4 most-populous states) allow "processing" of absentee/mail-in ballots prior to election day.
Processing means different things depending on exact state statutes, but can include anything from simply comparing the signature to the voter roll to make sure they match all the way up to running ballots through the scanner but not hitting the "tabulate" button which compiles the results. It usually includes signature match, removing from the envelope, flattening it, and stacking it with other ballots.
This way, when counting can officially begin (again, different depending on the state), all the officials have to do is put it in the machine for tabulation or hit the button to get the result, making the whole process much faster.
In California, for example, the first results published are almost always the mail-in ballots that were received well in advance of election day and have been prepped and were allowed to start being counted up to 29 days prior to the election.
Someone mentioned earlier that this could lead to vote tallies being leaked, however I've never seen that be an issue in California and, being the most populous state, you'd think if it were going to happen that's where it would occur. This is mostly because they aren't tabulated in a central system prior to election day.
ryumast3r t1_jecci5k wrote
Reply to comment by catdogs_boner in Manhole on Pitt campus installed between 1891 and 1911, when there was no 'H' in Pittsburgh by zan_yams
Or just a typo.