ryanov

ryanov t1_iwejt07 wrote

Reply to comment by Nwk_NJ in 7 Eleven to go by mantunesofnewark

Good; you were wasting my time.

For people to enjoy. Just not those people.

My point was that as long as these problems are out of your field of vision, it's apparently "problem solved."

Thank you, yes, the practical solution to homelessness is to invite everyone to come live with me in my studio apartment.

Dipshit.

1

ryanov t1_iwedytt wrote

It was cop versus cop in that election. I believe the one that lost had a ridiculously high number of use of force complaints (like highest in the department? it’s in the news) so at least there’s that, but still…

1

ryanov t1_iwedm0u wrote

Reply to comment by Nwk_NJ in 7 Eleven to go by mantunesofnewark

You know what, when your substance is suggesting that we should sweep undesirables out of your field of view, maybe rage is warranted.

What isn’t warranted is the amount of time I’m wasting on this thread.

Thanks much, though, for your valuable “go set up a commune” contribution to the discourse.

1

ryanov t1_iwedgh7 wrote

Reply to comment by Nwk_NJ in 7 Eleven to go by mantunesofnewark

The actual problem is that this whole country is full of people like you who think that something like this is fine as long as you don’t have to see it.

0

ryanov t1_iwed8dw wrote

Reply to comment by Echos_myron123 in 7 Eleven to go by mantunesofnewark

The most common interaction I have with 7-Eleven is someone who appears to be living on the street asking me if I will go in there and buy them some food. So, that would sort of seem to support the association between the poor/homeless and 7-Eleven, but it’s literally food.

1

ryanov t1_iwebn23 wrote

Reply to comment by Nwk_NJ in 7 Eleven to go by mantunesofnewark

They "cleaned up" the park by building a nice monument/water feature there, and then built a fucking ugly fence around it because it bothered them that people were hanging around there. It's embarrassing.

0

ryanov t1_iwea584 wrote

Reply to comment by ahtasva in 7 Eleven to go by mantunesofnewark

I suspect Silva would agree with you that the police should address the loitering problem, but I definitely don't. Loitering is not a real problem, and over-policing is.

0

ryanov t1_iwe9t8p wrote

Well, I suspected this guy was a dipshit, and I guess I'm glad to have it confirmed?

It's a convenience store. Like, I can understand wanting something better there, but if you're claiming that a convenience store is a cause of problems other than those problems being a symptom of something else, you may have your head up your ass.

1

ryanov t1_iw5vncd wrote

I didn’t see it happen, but walked past there not long after it happened. A car going southbound on. Broad Street appeared to have hit both the lamp post and/or traffic light on both the north and south corners of New St. I hope there wasn’t anybody standing at the bus stop there, or waiting to cross the street, because the car clearly came across both corner curb cut outs.

2

ryanov t1_iv91rg2 wrote

No one manager or above is in a union at Rutgers. UMDNJ (and now the former UMDNJ parts of Rutgers and UH) had supervisors in CWA. Rutgers has sort of the middle in an AFT union called “Union of Rutgers Administrators.” Some AFSCME too. Professionals and Nurses on the legacy-UMDNJ side of Rutgers (and increasingly the legacy Rutgers side too) are in my union (HPAE) and the non-clerical and housekeeping, etc., jobs are Teamsters. We also have OPEIU. There are also two different AAUP unions for the two legacy schools, and one for adjunct faculty.

You at NJIT?

3

ryanov t1_iv8zq0c wrote

Yes, I know that. I am the president of a union. It’s not true that everybody who doesn’t have a reporting line is in a union. There are people all over the place who are not for some reason, and we are working on that, as that was less true at UMDNJ.

I didn’t catch that you were asking about a union name. We don’t have one called PSA though.

The power of a union is in its members. A surprisingly small percentage of people seem to think this is a big deal anymore. There are somewhat more people who don’t want to go to the office because they just don’t want to and have shown that they don’t need to. Then there are others that are psyched “to see everyone’s face again.”

It’s hard to build a movement around safety when there don’t seem to be that many people that think there’s an actual safety problem.

5