rsandler
rsandler t1_ixxu6px wrote
My 2 cents: I am still the stubborn minority using TF. Mostly because of switching costs in my organization. But also, honestly, because I am decently happy with it. I think the ease-of-use gap between pytorch and TF was mostly erased with the release of TF2. I was really hoping that more of the research community would come back to TF after that, but unfortunately that has not been the case. In practice, it does suck to not have access to SOTA models. Otherwise, I think they are pretty similar.
rsandler t1_izghl8o wrote
Reply to comment by huberloss in [D] If you had to pick 10-20 significant papers that summarize the research trajectory of AI from the past 100 years what would they be by versaceblues
Alot of these paper titles are hallucinated.
For example, I couldnt find:
"Grammar Induction and Parsing with a Recursive Neural Network"
"A Survey of the Monte Carlo Method"
Also, interestingly, Pearl never wrote a book called "The Elements of a Scientific Theory of Intelligence", but in 2000 he did write his seminal "Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference" for which the description would apply very well to...