renerem
renerem t1_j9goh6i wrote
Reply to omg they sound like speakers by PlotTwistItWasMe
*DT880 enters the chat
*AKG K701 and K702 enter the chat
renerem t1_j1jsjoo wrote
Reply to comment by whats_you_doing in I guess we are all depressed by AzizAldubikhi
xD
renerem t1_j1e89cb wrote
Reply to I guess we are all depressed by AzizAldubikhi
Hmmmm
renerem t1_iy77v46 wrote
renerem t1_ixwbp6g wrote
I am very lucky that I never had comfort issues with any headphone so far, except a slight hotspot at the top of my head with the HD800S. And I also love clamp force, pretty much the more the better xD.
renerem t1_ivyb2f3 wrote
Reply to comment by The_Incredible_Rook in Cable identification? Saw a sweet deal for a 2022 Sundara on Ebay, seller stated it came with an "upgraded cable", but what is this cable exactly? by ItDoesntSeemToBeWrkn
Mine came broken xD
renerem t1_iu5pp84 wrote
Looking at what most high-end headphones offer in terms of frequency response, especially closed-backs, no
renerem t1_itvvhkt wrote
If I remember correctly I think Rtings is using the HD800S's frequency response (a headphone known for it's huge soundstage) as a reference for the soundstage "measurements" of other headphones. And while I think that you definitely can get an idea on the stage of a headphone with their measurements, it is not an accurate thing and you should use your own ears for that in the end. But yes, the HD600 is not that good of a choice if you are looking for an expansive stage and the SR850 might very well be "better" than the HD600 for that, just like Rtings suggests.
renerem t1_isfer5a wrote
Yea, e. g. if you lower treble frequencies most likely the soundstage will get smaller, details are also harder to pick out of the mix if the treble is on a lower volume. Imaging is also kind of dependent on treble frequencies in my experience. Tactility is probably one of the things that I haven't noticed changing too much, because it is more of a "technical ability" of the driver itself.
However, most headphones tonalities benefit massively from EQ, so I am not too concerned about the negatives. Some headphones shouldn't be EQ'd too much though in my opinion, e. g. the HD800 and HD800S lose much of their "speciality" (their massive soundstage and fantastic imaging) if you lower the treble volume too much.
renerem t1_irxc31x wrote
Reply to IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
I thought this was a troll post and you wanted to suggest plugging your headphones into the airpod case to listen to music xD
renerem t1_irwdfrz wrote
Reply to comment by Fun_Cake_5635 in Whats the best way to get into this hobby by Fun_Cake_5635
Oh, IEM=In Ear Monitor
renerem t1_irvsqhg wrote
Tbh, the budget IEM market is pretty crazy at the moment and you can find good entry stuff for around $20-30 e. g. 7Hz Salnotes Zero, Moondrop Chu etc.
If you want over-ear headphones I'd recommend starting somewhere in the $150-200 range. Well tuned headphones around that price that are great as a reference are e. g. the AKG K371 or K361, the Sennheiser HD560S or the Sennheiser/Drop HD6XX.
After you got some experience with these kinds of headphones that are generally regarded as well tuned, you can make your mind up about things you maybe don't like or want to change e. g. more/less treble, more/less bass, more/less midrange, better detail retrieval etc. after all music is a very subjective thing, but you need a good "baseline" to start off of imo.
There are a bunch of Youtube channels I generally would recommend for beginners to take a look into: The Headphone Show, DMS (to some degree), Joshua Valour (to some degree), Crinacle. Stay away from channels like Z Reviews, most of his videos shouldn't be taken seriously and lack the scientific value.
renerem t1_j9llzxv wrote
Reply to I turned my 6XX into a weighted blanket by GHOSTVIPERZ28
Well, a closed back HD650 or HD600 is the dream of many people out there, but I guess your dream turned out to be a nightmare xD