redlow0992
redlow0992 t1_irm06yw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] how hard is it for an undergrad to publish a first author paper at a reputable conference/journal? by djssoapappskdid
>o people publish as first authors during let say senior year? Like do I need to start reading ml theory and stuff now? I’m still taking calculus 1 as a fre
They get guidance. The question is not if you can write a paper as a BSC or not, it is whether your knowledge/commitment is worthy of some senior researchers time to guide you on how to navigate research/literature.
redlow0992 t1_irlo76r wrote
Reply to [D] how hard is it for an undergrad to publish a first author paper at a reputable conference/journal? by djssoapappskdid
Without guidance? Extremely hard. I've had quite a lot of brilliant BSc students (or recent BSc grads) as interns who were able to get quite a lot of work done. The problem is, writing a paper is a lot more than simply doing the experiments. Primarily, I found that many students at that level struggle writing cohesive paragraphs, describing how the literature relates to the work that's being done, and clearly explaining the concepts, experiments etc. Then, you typically get weak rejects because the writing is not good or things are not clear.
Many people make the assumption that publishing is about ideas. This couldn't be more false. In fact, execution is often more important than the idea itself. A poorly executed good idea will get rejected. Well executed average idea will be accepted. Apart from these, as I said above, writing is one of the primary elements of the paper. I have seen quite a lot of papers where decent writing basically carried the entire paper, even though the idea was meh.
All in all, when you publish for 5+ years, you generally take many things for granted. But, if your are writing a paper for the first time without any guidance, you are looking to learn things the hard way (via rejections).
redlow0992 t1_j7elzrw wrote
Reply to comment by CKtalon in [D] Yann Lecun seems to be very petty against ChatGPT by supersoldierboy94
Are we only talking in the context of LLMs and language? If not, your statement is simply incorrect. In past two years FAIR published a number of high-quality self-superviser learning frameworks that come with open source implementations. On top of my head, MoCo (and its versions), Barlow Twins, VicReg, Swav all came from FAIR. They are the one that showed that SSL for computer vision does not need to be contrastive only. Some of these papers have some 5K citations in the span of 3 years and are used by many researchers on a daily basis.
But yeah, tell me how they are chasing corporate KPIs and are publishing junk.