pterofactyl

pterofactyl t1_iwq1ls0 wrote

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/antitrust-law.asp

I think you should. Anti trust laws prevent buyers from preventing suppliers from supplying to other businesses, but if a supplier pays for themselves to be your supplier, that is not anti trust.

Is Nike in violation because they pay teams to use only their shoes and clothes? Literally think about this. Are restaurants in violation for agreeing to stock only Pepsi products?

0

pterofactyl t1_iwjbz5l wrote

Ok so again… that’s a business deal. Do you understand that me paying you to exclusively use my product is completely legal and not even immoral unless it causes harm on a person? If a company bribes a doctor to use only their brand of medicine, that’s immoral. If a company pays a sports team to only use their products and avoid all others, that’s literally the basis of sports sponsorships. Amd presented the best case for dell to only use their chips. Is your workplace bribing you by paying you a set fee with the understanding that you only work for them and no one else? Come on man

0