psc1919

psc1919 t1_jdfaigo wrote

Nobody seems to be pointing out that the city is ending this because of a union grievance. The city tried something new to solve a real problem and the union used its contract/the law to block it. Please share the blame and recognize that in some cases the union’s interest don’t align with residents’ interests.

6

psc1919 t1_j23ujvi wrote

First, it only applies to audio. So if there was no audio recorded and only video, then there is no possible violation.

Second, there must be a reasonable expectation of privacy where the recording is taken. Although that is case by case basis, that is basically never anywhere in public setting.

1