probably_terran
probably_terran t1_j0qth10 wrote
Reply to comment by BlueSkyToday in Nuclear fusion breakthrough: What does it mean for space exploration? by Gari_305
Do people in the industry find the messaging around fusion ‘Q’ values as gross as I do (who is firmly in the Dunning–Kruger area of the knowledge curve)?
The media is gonna media going after clicks but even science people in interviews tend to gloss over or outright ignore the uncounted energy going in to the reaction and inefficiencies coming out (making Q total < 0.1 or worse). They make it sound like real world fusion is right around the corner. I can’t help but think they are doing it for the funding.
probably_terran t1_j0z3rev wrote
Reply to comment by ItsAConspiracy in Nuclear fusion breakthrough: What does it mean for space exploration? by Gari_305
I didn’t mean to suggest it wasn’t a major milestone… but the first step of many and the goal of Qtotal > 1 is not particularly close. But a lot of the messaging ignores Qtotal completely and at least to me suggests ‘just a few more dollars and we’ll have clean free energy forever. trust me.’ I’d be fine with small scale projects but some (ITER) are billions. To me a proof of concept is worth more like millions.