peteysweetusername
peteysweetusername t1_jdwn6ky wrote
Reply to Union Jobs information.. by givingup3579
It would help to know your wills and your wonts. For example as a prison guard you’ll make good money ($75k) and get a pension after 20 years but you may not want to do that kind of work. I know law enforcement is looking for women for all roles not just police so think trial court officers too.
You could make $100/hr as an underwater welder but that means welding and diving experience. But that’s got a death rate of like one out of seven people.
Are you looking for an office type job, inside/outside work, do you have a clean driving record for a trucking job?
peteysweetusername t1_jdhqx0r wrote
Reply to “Click-to-cancel” rule would penalize companies that make you cancel by phone - Canceling a subscription shouldn't be harder than signing up, FTC proposal says. - How will The Globe or America's Test Kitchen Survive?!?!1?! by arch_llama
Cvs - do you want to opt in for advertising spam? Yes, click this screen. No? Well you’re already opted in but if you want to opt out call our call center in India, wait on hold for 15 minutes, and struggle to communicate opting out to someone who barely speaks English.
I don’t know why this hasn’t been implemented years ago. Congress used to make laws forbidding spam calls at certain times and different sound levels during commercials
peteysweetusername t1_jdde132 wrote
Reply to comment by SomeSortofDisaster in Former Tyngsboro cop sentenced to one year and one day in prison by ak47workaccnt
Unfortunately probably sooner. If you get sentenced federally for a year or less you serve the full time. Anything beyond a year, you can get “discounts.” So for good behavior, 54 days will be wiped off your sentence so it’s really like 10 months. Not sure if there’s any other discounts you can get but
peteysweetusername t1_jc29k61 wrote
Reply to Can a former employer mention that someone was let go in a reference in Massachusetts? by Limulemur
Legally yes but many companies don’t want litigation in cases where a former employee can sue for slander. Most companies have policies that will say position held at termination and how long you were employed. Some will say eligible or not eligible for rehire but there are many reasons you may not be eligible. I’m assuming you’re asking this question because of a firing.
Large companies outsource these referrals to a third party company called the work number. This is considered a credit bureau for legal purposes and you can request a copy of your file
peteysweetusername t1_j8tygkx wrote
Reply to comment by DocPsychosis in Boston’s Pride parade set to return this summer under new leadership and new name by bostonglobe
I fuckin love that show!
peteysweetusername t1_j7ufnen wrote
Reply to comment by Ialnyien in Exonerees in Mass. state drug lab scandal want their seized property and money back by ak47workaccnt
You should research “motel caswell” in Tewksbury. It closed years ago and is now a retail strip but the government tried to take the property through civil forfeiture. There were 14 drug related arrests at the property during a time where he rented 200,000 rooms. I used to live up there and there was more drug activity at a McDonald’s down the street but the government didn’t go after that corporate property.
The owner ended up having to front $100,000 in legal fees before a non profit ended up taking the case. The judge ended up ruling in caswells favor after years of stress and money spent.
This is the problem with civil forfeiture because you need to prove your innocence against the government which has unlimited resources compared to a private citizen. The government just has to make an accusation.
peteysweetusername t1_j7sqi7r wrote
Reply to comment by majoroutage in Exonerees in Mass. state drug lab scandal want their seized property and money back by ak47workaccnt
It should be criminal asset forfeiture
peteysweetusername t1_j7q3v8b wrote
Reply to Exonerees in Mass. state drug lab scandal want their seized property and money back by ak47workaccnt
God damm, why wasn’t this rectified years ago. The bar for Civil forfeiture should be “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Herion dealers should not be able to keep their cash or cars purchased with drug money but having such a low bar on the books leads to cases like that of motel caswell in Tewksbury
peteysweetusername t1_j6nq1lp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Should there be a ballot initiative about repealing Section 9A(a) of a law banning public employees from striking? by 96suluman
^this is the correct answer
peteysweetusername t1_j64b764 wrote
Reply to Struggling Mass. GOP had just $35,000 in its coffers, on net, treasurer says - The Boston Globe by TouchDownBurrito
The slow drip drip drip of bad news for the mass GOP is being done to push Lyons out. This is a good thing. Have the GOP wash it’s hands of the MAGA wing and hopefully things improve
peteysweetusername t1_j5valc5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Dental Insurance which covers 4 cleaning per year? by aleshere
Are you saying I have two insurances?
peteysweetusername t1_j5v7lga wrote
Reply to comment by makeupobsessedlawyer in Dental Insurance which covers 4 cleaning per year? by aleshere
As others have said on this post you don’t get “cleanings” after periodontal work you get perio maintenance which is covered every three months
peteysweetusername t1_j5v7cyl wrote
Reply to comment by makeupobsessedlawyer in Dental Insurance which covers 4 cleaning per year? by aleshere
This is the answer. His/her office probably doesn’t know how to code it
peteysweetusername t1_j5ui353 wrote
Reply to comment by aleshere in Dental Insurance which covers 4 cleaning per year? by aleshere
If you need scaling get it done asap. If your dentist is recommending it with cleanings 4x per year your gum recession is likely bad. A scaling will get the gunk that’s accumulating underneath the gum line and will improve your mouth hygiene. It will also qualify you for four free cleanings per year
peteysweetusername t1_j5u6bsi wrote
Reply to comment by aleshere in Dental Insurance which covers 4 cleaning per year? by aleshere
Sorry to be blowing up your post but the reality is dental hygienists are getting $50 per hour. When you tack on overhead costs you’re not going to get a cleaning anywhere near what you’re expecting
peteysweetusername t1_j5u61jj wrote
I get four per year and have had insurance with both delta and blue cross. Because I had scaling done a few years ago the 4x per year was covered. Not sure if that’s the case with you but I can find out more if that sounds familiar
peteysweetusername t1_j4xmckq wrote
Reply to comment by 1998_2009_2016 in The Lobster Pot in PTown is for sale if anyone is in the market by roadtrip-ne
There’s real estate and a business valuation involved. Do you think at 20x ebitda value is fair?
peteysweetusername t1_j4xlzby wrote
Reply to comment by Horknut1 in The Lobster Pot in PTown is for sale if anyone is in the market by roadtrip-ne
Exactly. I know it’s a storied place with Anthony bourdain working there in all but they’re clearly looking for a stupid buyer
peteysweetusername t1_j4wur5c wrote
Reply to comment by TywinShitsGold in The Lobster Pot in PTown is for sale if anyone is in the market by roadtrip-ne
But that’s 3.5mm in profit, not revenue. Assuming a high profit margin of 20% that would mean annual revenue close to 18mm or like $50k per day, that’s everyday, including the off season.
peteysweetusername t1_j15jmue wrote
Let them stay fired!
peteysweetusername t1_iyp0aeq wrote
peteysweetusername t1_ixr74ve wrote
Yup
peteysweetusername t1_iwjd1ob wrote
Happy cake day!
peteysweetusername t1_ivq6dsu wrote
Reply to comment by WinsingtonIII in Who else is surprised Q4 was so close? by 737900ER
What I meant was more of a take on the legislature. These ballot votes show where the public at large thinks and they overwhelmingly supported question 2. In my book, with that kind of support, the legislature should have easily passed this legislation rather than having to collect tens of thousands of signatures. They did vote to pass questions that ultimately lot are being decided on a 55/45 margin. The difference to me is obviously lobbyist influence
peteysweetusername t1_jdwybd3 wrote
Reply to House Speaker Ron Mariano rejecting 'unconstitutional' plan to audit his office by new State Auditor, Diana DiZoglio by lurker_registered
I’m happy DiZoglio is taking this on. The posture that the ballot box is the only check and balance Mariano is making is bullshit. Keep an eye out for her. Her star is rising as she’s the type of politician we desperately need in this state