panonius
panonius t1_j1lm2y9 wrote
Reply to comment by Zanderax in From sexual union to the divine – the teachings of Ibn al-‘Arabi by ADefiniteDescription
Nah, you are just arguing in bad faith. What you are defining is defined as subsistence wage. Living wage is defined as a minimum to live a basic but decent life. Also saying that money is not a measure of success anywhere in the western world is 100% bad faith.
panonius t1_j1lkz9f wrote
Reply to comment by Zanderax in From sexual union to the divine – the teachings of Ibn al-‘Arabi by ADefiniteDescription
Mhm, and all that talk about being paid a livable wage is just people focusing on the wrong things in life right?
panonius t1_j1li3q2 wrote
Reply to comment by Zanderax in From sexual union to the divine – the teachings of Ibn al-‘Arabi by ADefiniteDescription
Yeah, you could argue that a successful career need not involve money. However telling people they were wrong to assume that money is the expected reward sounds either dishonest or entitled.
panonius t1_j1lfzqp wrote
Reply to comment by Zanderax in From sexual union to the divine – the teachings of Ibn al-‘Arabi by ADefiniteDescription
Ok, I'll bite. Explain how polyamory will optimize reproductive success for all involved in the relationship compared to an exclusive pairing. Please do gloss over the problem of inheritance.
panonius t1_j1r1z28 wrote
Reply to comment by Saadiqfhs in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 26, 2022 by BernardJOrtcutt
I don't see a realistic scenario where people would be kept in a matrix like simulation without informed consent.
In my opinion, the matrix-ish simulation will either exist as entertainment or something to keep generation ship passengers from going mad or to keep them from forgetting how to function on a planet.