I only watched the first episode of the Traitors, but I found the concept of it frustraiting when comparing it to The Mole.
In The Mole, at the end of the game the Mole gets nothing; so it makes sense that they would sabotage missions in order to bring down the prize pot.
Whereas in The Traitors, if a traitor can stay undetected and get to the end (I assume) they would win the prize pot; therefore they WOULDN'T want to sabotage missions. Traitors will vote to "kill off" "the faithful" (non-traitors) each night; making the game, in my opinion, really inbalanced.
overseergti t1_j00wk11 wrote
Reply to comment by stoopidperson in The Traitors on BBC in the UK is the best reality game show in the last 10 years by Bettalad
I only watched the first episode of the Traitors, but I found the concept of it frustraiting when comparing it to The Mole.
In The Mole, at the end of the game the Mole gets nothing; so it makes sense that they would sabotage missions in order to bring down the prize pot.
Whereas in The Traitors, if a traitor can stay undetected and get to the end (I assume) they would win the prize pot; therefore they WOULDN'T want to sabotage missions. Traitors will vote to "kill off" "the faithful" (non-traitors) each night; making the game, in my opinion, really inbalanced.