What benefit then do we get by stipulating a percentage of premium money spent on care if they will simply raise premiums by 90% to make a 10% gain? I feel like the consumer is always the loser in political vs company monetary affairs. As to the license: i would say illegal in country = shouldn’t be in country = no license. But i really wish politicians would figure out and implement a better legal immigration mechanism.

If Dental companies are to increase money spent on care, would they simply do that and make up the difference by lowering salaries or eliminating positions, or by raising premiums to cover the difference? Im thinking they would raise the premiums and consumers end up losing mightily. And shouldn’t licenses be obtainable to those whom have followed laws already and not illegally entered a country?