nuclear_splines
nuclear_splines t1_iwid0jw wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-disaster2022 in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Yeah, I wasn’t thinking of the code being proprietary, but the data. One of my friends is a nuclear engineer, and as an undergraduate student she had to pass a background check before the DoE would mail her a DVD containing high-accuracy data on measurements of nuclear material, because that’s not shared publicly. Not my background, so I don’t know precisely what the measurements were, but I imagine data on weapons grade materials is protected more thoroughly than the reactor tech she was working with.
nuclear_splines t1_iwgik6l wrote
Reply to comment by damattdanman in AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers by Avieshek
Goes with the rest - precise simulations of nuclear material are often highly classified. Sometimes also things like “simulating the spread of a bio weapon attack, using AT&Ts cell tower data to get high precision info about population density across an entire city.”
nuclear_splines t1_iu148zu wrote
Reply to comment by kreiger-69 in Android phones offered early US quake warning, beating iPhones to the punch | Google's earthquake detection network turns Android phones into seismometers, and it paid off yesterday. by chrisdh79
SpotShotter? Technically yes, but it works terribly. Even the Wikipedia articles second sentence reads “researchers have noted concerns about effectiveness, reliability, privacy, and equity [of ShotSpotter]”
nuclear_splines t1_jbz9vkm wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in There are certain species of mushrooms that can't be cultivated artificially and only found naturally in the wild, are there also any plants that are unable to be grown artificially? by PianoTrumpetMax
I don’t think that’s what they’re saying at all; it’s not that it hasn’t been done, it’s that no one’s found a practical way to do it at scale and make pig milk (pilk?) a viable product