notasrelevant

notasrelevant t1_j55dcb0 wrote

In this case, there was an agreement in place for compensation, but a party was not properly compensated. The suit ended with that party receiving compensation similar to what was supposed to be received, accounting for the growth on value as well.

It's a bit more of a straightforward case as conditions for receiving said compensation were outlined in contract, with specific numbers and the value at the time and present day values are known.

The case of the army vet is not a fair compensation, but it's hard to compare to a case when a contract between 2 parties was established and agreed upon and included specific details outlining compensation.

5

notasrelevant t1_iybm0xq wrote

Texas has its issues, sure, but this was a small failure that was fixed in a short window. The boil notice is issued by default when such issues occur until tests could be completed to confirm the water is safe. The water was tested to be safe and the notice was cancelled.

This kind of thing could happen anywhere. Proper protocols were followed and everything was remedied in a timely manner and there was basically no impact on the people living there. It's not like this was remotely close to something like the Flint water issues or the more recent Jackson issues.

1

notasrelevant t1_irufx9q wrote

The reporters entered the country on tourist visas, not media visas or any type of working visa.

They then broke into a crime scene without any permission.

So that in addition to this being maybe a much less common crime in the area in which people are still very shook up makes the whole thing a lot more messy and unprofessional.

1