Even though you deleted the thread because you couldn't answer a straight-forward question, here's something to clue you in - it actually costs Netflix more to stream a show after the 30 day window than during it, due to shuffling content around on local delivery systems to save bandwidth.

https://www.theverge.com/22787426/netflix-cdn-open-connect

​

But keep citing public metrics and telling half the story like you have it figured out already.

How can you evaluate their decisions based on a half-complete assessment of partial data? How can you estimate how much a show costs vs how much it produces to show if it's successful or not? Why do you insist on this simple metric as somehow descriptive of a shows success?

How can you be so confident in your assessment when you have no insight into what is a notoriously shadowy decision-making process?

It's so weird. There's a real sentiment that Netflix is just cancelling successful shows to hurt people's feelings and be mean. There's no other reason!