munkie15
munkie15 t1_jck9i73 wrote
Reply to comment by Additional_Fail_5270 in "You don’t like it because you don’t get it, you don’t get it because you’re not ___________" by JohnTaylorson
Exactly. I’m currently reading “Stolen Focus” by Johann Hari. He talks about this very thing. It’s pretty interesting so far.
munkie15 t1_jch6eyh wrote
Reply to comment by Additional_Fail_5270 in "You don’t like it because you don’t get it, you don’t get it because you’re not ___________" by JohnTaylorson
That’s a great breakdown.
I think the problem lies in how most information is communicated, electronically. I think this mode of transmission conditions people to react very quickly. This quick reaction does not bode well for any sort of in depth discussion, on any topic, let alone a very complex topic.
munkie15 t1_ja7kfhj wrote
I’ve only read “Dark Matter” and it was very ‘meh’. The premise was interesting, but the execution was closer to terrible than it was good. I don’t know if his other works are similar.
munkie15 t1_ja5t31u wrote
Sounds like you may be more visually inclined. I have a very high auditory inclination. So audiobooks work great for me.
munkie15 t1_j9yuy08 wrote
Why would reading a little everyday be a bad habit? In my opinion, it is a good habit to be consistently reading something everyday.
munkie15 t1_j95ofc4 wrote
Reply to Physical book vs. Audible? by LawrenceLotze
I consume more books through audible than I do physical books right now. But I usually go in waves, switching back and forth between physical and audiobooks.
munkie15 t1_j70e4si wrote
Those three books are some of my favorite whodunits. I love all the characters and their development through out the books.
munkie15 t1_j6gbz6q wrote
Reply to What is a plot/world-building issue that breaks your suspension of disbelief? by JonathanCue
For reasons you described that is why I’m picky about magical realism. So far the only series that I think have addressed the issue well have been The Dresden Files and the Harry Potter series.
What ruins my suspension of belief is when authors do such terrible research into widely accessible information. Like first aid, basic emergency medicine, basic firearm safety, fundamental urban combat movement, etc… all of these are easy to find and easy to portray correctly. But too many times authors just phone things like that in. The example that comes to mind of some of the most egregious lack of research in those regards is “Dark Matter” by Blake Crouch.
munkie15 t1_j6fa9kc wrote
I randomly found this book at a used book store and figured I would give it a whirl. I too thoroughly enjoyed the book. I was impressed with how much I was sucked into his story. I know I missed some details about things reading it as an American, but it was still great. I enjoyed it so much it made me check out “Slade House” as well. Also, just as good.
munkie15 t1_j5t7ncz wrote
Reply to How do you read non fiction books? by Retep_Rup
I will pause on sections and think about it for a bit, if I feel I need some notes I’ll jot them in the margin. Sometimes I need to reread that section or paragraph, then make notes. I guess I just read the book twice on one reading.
munkie15 t1_j5o9lnz wrote
Fiction - fantasy, sci-fi, whodunits, horror. I generally don’t get into the sub-categories of those genres
Non-fiction - this is quite a broad spectrum, but mostly psychology, neuroscience, evolution, religion, biographies, physics, astrophysics, biology, history, philosophy. Pretty much anything that I can understand and interests me.
munkie15 t1_j5eokk5 wrote
Reply to Greetings everyone! A lot of people say reading books is beneficial for you, though... by RaderH2O
Yes, every book can be beneficial to read. As long as you have the ability to read beyond the words.
For example; I only used to read non-fiction. I thought fiction was just as worthless as prime time sitcoms. A mindless escape from the world. But my wife finally convinced me to read some fiction. After I began reading fiction, it helped me connect lots of the things I’ve been reading about to actual human beings. It definitely helped me become more empathetic to others. It also helped me integrate the information from non-fiction books into my daily life.
Most of the fiction I read is fantasy, sci-fi, and whodunits.
munkie15 t1_j3qwvwy wrote
Everybody has their styles they enjoy more than others. But I do feel it is not good to completely disregard fiction. Fiction is great for helping give perspective. Maybe look for the “popcorn” type books? The ones that don’t really have plot twists or any big surprise. Or just read the spoilers about the crazy plot twists? Mysteries aren’t for everyone.
For years I only read non-fiction, I enjoyed learning pieces of many different things. But I lacked the context to put them together. My friends started calling me the “parade of facts”. Reading fiction has helped me put these “facts” into better context. It also helped me realize most people don’t like listening to a parade of facts. But in the end, what you read is up to you.
munkie15 t1_jcotmz6 wrote
Reply to Do you ever look up the authors you're reading to get to know them better? by justkeepbreathing94
No. For the most part I separate the author from their work. The exceptions would be non-fiction books. I will look up those authors to get an idea of how serious to take the topic they are writing about. There has only been one author I looked up to get personal incites about, Ayn Rand. The only reason I looked her up was first to find some redeeming quality or reason for your writing style and philosophy. Then it just turned into animosity ammo to argue against her proponents.