moonshinedegreaser

moonshinedegreaser t1_j0vjob5 wrote

What I'm saying is that a good number of people believe that it's one or the other when really, it's not. It's all of them combined that make these judgements of how everything works

-Technology. -We have entered a post-truth era. -We’re polarized, sorted socially and geographically along partisan lines. -Our leaders. -Psychology.

Why does it have to be just one and why can't it be all? Why can't we as individuals look at an opposing individual and say "everything is fucked up and we are both feeding into it"?

12

moonshinedegreaser t1_j0u6mqw wrote

I have more questions about the conclusions of why political climate is the way it is. Why can't political belief be a combination of all of the things they are referring to? I know a lot of people would like one specific answer as to why, but why can't we have all these things stacked against us as individuals and citizens?

27