mocha_sweetheart
mocha_sweetheart t1_j2cj33x wrote
Reply to comment by throwaway_almost in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
yep! Enjoy
mocha_sweetheart t1_j2ceszs wrote
Reply to comment by throwaway_almost in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
You might be using the actual gpt3 thing etc. not the openAI chatbot itself
mocha_sweetheart t1_j2a1cxy wrote
Reply to comment by Umbristopheles in Revolutionary machine learning weather simulator by DeepMind & Google’s ML-Based "GraphCast" outperforms top global forecasting system. GraphCast can generate accurate 10-day forecasts at a resolution of 25 km in under 60 seconds. by vegita1022
Yep, innovations every week are amazing
mocha_sweetheart t1_j1ydxoq wrote
Reply to comment by dontfuckwmeiwillcry in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
They said the AI might be seeing the media where everyone treats it like a monster and because it sees that it takes on that as it's role since it assumes that's what we want from it
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1y1p9i wrote
Reply to comment by tjr5zz in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
>Using bitcoin as an example, you can only mine 6.25 coins per block--roughly every 10 minutes.
Who, exactly, is stopping the rich from just opening multiple accounts and multiple miners for each one? They have the money, they have the resources, they have the land, and there sure as hell isn't stopping from just making bot bitcoin wallets etc.?!
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1xw07d wrote
Reply to comment by tjr5zz in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
I think you're the one that needs to be smacked in the face with reality on this. Let's say, fine, everyone adopts crypto. With crypto what exactly is stopping the elites from buying a bunch of it and a ton of supercomputer-level miners and stopping everyone from getting anything more than marginal sums? BTW, you can find examples of anarchist societies throughout history and more about why it works I think even in the same playlist.
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1xsote wrote
Reply to comment by tjr5zz in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Can you exactly point out any flaws of it please? The “incentive to make it work” is a better life for everyone.
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1xp1v3 wrote
Reply to comment by tjr5zz in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
No, the suggestion is to directly change the system so there are no elites and that everything is ruled from the ground up by us the people instead of the top down. Again, you didn’t watch anything I sent. Clearly you are not capable of honest debate or discussion.
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1wwu5e wrote
Reply to comment by tjr5zz in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Yeah, bitcoin is not very decentralized https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/sxy32g/crypto_is_not_decentralized/
Did you even watch the first few minutes of the videos?
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1wq7un wrote
Reply to comment by tjr5zz in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
If you're actually interested in learning about a system where there would be no such elites while innovation moves forward and often even better without them, I've linked a youtube series and a few sites and reddit threads below that explain in far more detail than one single comment can. At a high level, communism is a classless stateless system which falls closely in line with anarchism in which there are no unjust hierarchies; Anarchism is a pretty sophisticated philosophy. Anarchism just means "no rulers", not "no rules." Arguably this gives MORE liberty than a democratic republic because communes can form under and make their own rules which prevents the majority from oppressing the minority. Anarchocommunist theory has been explained a LOT already, so how about I link you to examples of people who actually do better than I can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3nxK-0CTY0&list=PLVlCbf75cne_jbxwHwSaPdT65npiGhQrr
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-berkman-what-is-communist-anarchism
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/ee7bmv/what_stops_anarchocommunism_from_devolving_into/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/gb1yz1/would_anarcho_communism_work_on_large_scale/
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1wd11d wrote
Reply to comment by BlueShipman in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
- Cars are arguably far more dangerous, the NHTSA says that 42,915 people died from motor vehicles in 2021 alone
- To make healthy communities you need to give everyone better opportunities and equality, and give mental healthcare to those who need it, that’s why people are going into crime because of the lack of such things, try solving the root causes to things
mocha_sweetheart t1_j1w9442 wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Box_907 in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
Did you see the response on the communism thing in the other thread? Also did you expect me to not notice how you didn’t respond to any other part of my comment?
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1w8ne3 wrote
Reply to comment by NewCenturyNarratives in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Yeah I found this person’s response incredibly funny honestly
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1w8k42 wrote
Reply to comment by NewCenturyNarratives in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
I know right?!
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1w8c7p wrote
Reply to comment by genericrich in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Question, can I PM you?
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1w84ki wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Doesn’t people being dependent on cars prove the point though? They don’t want to be dependent on cars anymore.
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1w7tei wrote
Reply to comment by fitandhealthyguy in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
I already mentioned about using trains and other similar methods for travel across long distances
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1w7esn wrote
Reply to comment by Artanthos in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Very good question, I was initially coming at it with the angle of growing food inside of cities like hydroponics etc. and most of the rest of the land would be nature reserves, natural parks and so on, I’ll think about that
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1u7tj1 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
No seriously (Can you please edit your comment)
mocha_sweetheart t1_j1u7nnd wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Box_907 in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
I posted a video link and other stuff in another reply to you that explains everything that will help
mocha_sweetheart t1_j1u7i95 wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Box_907 in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
Read the other reply I made on anarchocommunism on this, in the video series I linked the guy explaining things is actually agreeing with you on this part and so did many anarchocommunist thinkers and even Karl Marx himself regarding topics like gun control etc.
mocha_sweetheart t1_j1u76kl wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Box_907 in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
Here's something similar to the sheet with dozens of studies supportiing trans people etc. while I find the new link https://www.reddit.com/r/musicotic/comments/8ttud4/a_comprehensive_defense_of_trans_people/
- You talk about these few anecdotal examples because of the body horror aspect of people feeling trapped in the wrong body, but that's already how trans people feel in situations where they are unable to transition. The reason people often try to block having the puberty of the gender they don't identify with is because that feeling of being in the wrong body is so painful that most of us get suicidal ideation from it; In fact... Well-being (of transgender children after puberty suppression) was similar to or better than same-age young adults from the general population. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/09/02/peds.2013-2958 Early transition virtually eliminates these higher rates of depression and low self-worth http://www.jaacap.com/article/S0890-8567%2816%2931941-4/fulltext Transition dramatically improves mental health among trans kids https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-03/tes-sdc030615.php The younger one transitions, the fewer problems one will have https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23512380
- Well, they are different phenomena that feel very differently and you'd understand if it you had gender dysphoria but you don't, and most trans people talk about how hormone therapy helps with some of those issues but not others making the distinction even easier
3.1 First of all, read the replies on this thread that explain it a lot better https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/u3e7ad/comment/i4oy0j8/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Second of all, again, claims about identity are always unfalsifiable and I will not tolerate you denying my identity or dismissing it. I am a woman
- Yes, exactly, you can't prove a chimp's identity much the same way as how some external features don't prove a person's internal neurological identity
mocha_sweetheart t1_j1u5xzw wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Box_907 in This is how chatGPT sees itself. by Kindly-Customer-1312
If you're actually interested in learning about this, I've linked a youtube series and a few sites and reddit threads below that explain in far more detail than one single comment can. At a high level, communism is a classless stateless system which falls closely in line with anarchism in which there are no unjust hierarchies; Anarchism is a pretty sophisticated philosophy. Anarchism just means "no rulers", not "no rules." Arguably this gives MORE liberty than a democratic republic because communes can form under and make their own rules which prevents the majority from oppressing the minority. Anarchocommunist theory has been explained a LOT already, so how about I link you to examples of people who actually do better than I can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3nxK-0CTY0&list=PLVlCbf75cne_jbxwHwSaPdT65npiGhQrr
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-berkman-what-is-communist-anarchism
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/ee7bmv/what_stops_anarchocommunism_from_devolving_into/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/gb1yz1/would_anarcho_communism_work_on_large_scale/
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1u4ra3 wrote
Reply to comment by enilea in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
That's just bad car-based city planning which is exactly what I'm complaining about
mocha_sweetheart t1_j3egnq5 wrote
Reply to comment by Honest-Cauliflower64 in Now that’s pretty significant! (By Anthropic) by MajorUnderstanding2
Good luck and also it’s a good idea I’ll look into it too, any pointers/advice?