megaultraman

megaultraman OP t1_jeaik93 wrote

Yes and that amount, less liabilities, is their profit margin. In total last year, that amount was $5 billion. But they now have $70 billion less in assets! That is what deposits are to a bank: liabilities. Otherwise, where do they get the money to give them their deposits back?

And instead of selling those assets for a massive loss, they borrowed against them! From the Fed. At 5%. So now they have 40% less assets to pay an extra $5 billion dollars in interest payments.

The question then, and the point of this post, is WHERE ARE THEY GETTING THAT MONEY?

1

megaultraman OP t1_jeaelmd wrote

That $30 billion was just a token vote of confidence and only has a lifespan of 3 months. But maybe JPM et al will loan them $30 billion at rock bottom rates indefinitely, but I doubt it. Then it's back to the discount window for them.

So they are going to blow through all their cash and sell their loans at a loss when they can just borrow the damn money and use that to make money instead? I don't hear about anybody liquidating assets to pay back the Fed, do you?

1

megaultraman OP t1_jeadp7y wrote

My man, in order to not pay interest they need to pay back the principal. So where are they getting this $70 billion to pay back those loans in two months?! Sell their treasuries at a loss that is a lot greater than 5%? You need to learn how balance sheets work.

1

megaultraman t1_ix0wdvb wrote

idk why you're being an asshole to the person replying. Seems like they are giving solid advice along your preferred "price-action" modality. they don't have to be an expert to give good advice, you have to be good enough to sift through what is good advice and what is not. And humble enough not to be a prick about it.

10