m1rrari
m1rrari t1_iuh1fwu wrote
Reply to comment by DilbertHigh in TIL about the "Raines sandwich;" an inedible piece of "food" that served as a way to bypass prohibition laws. by Alabussy
From a booze perspective, probably not.
BUT sugar isn’t a restricted substance, so there’s a lot of fun and crazy desserteries.
m1rrari t1_iuh1bgz wrote
Reply to comment by MarshallStoute in TIL about the "Raines sandwich;" an inedible piece of "food" that served as a way to bypass prohibition laws. by Alabussy
Recommended NA (non-alcoholic) beer, since they mentioned they were a year sober but miss the taste and experience of drinking a beer. Seems reasonable.
m1rrari t1_iuh12dj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in TIL about the "Raines sandwich;" an inedible piece of "food" that served as a way to bypass prohibition laws. by Alabussy
Eh… they made $9 on a can of soup. I’m sure they are okay with it.
m1rrari t1_iuj2dfb wrote
Reply to comment by MarshallStoute in TIL about the "Raines sandwich;" an inedible piece of "food" that served as a way to bypass prohibition laws. by Alabussy
That’s fair. Acronyms are the worst, they trade brevity for clarity. I campaign against them at work and in other spaces for this exact reason. Sadly they are going no where. NA could just have easily been a “North American” beer or something else*