logantuc
logantuc t1_jaeb6y2 wrote
Reply to comment by WhiskeyAndKisses in ‘cruelty-free’ circus replaced animals with holograms by davster39
More like we’re not assuming shit just because it could be something they think. There’s no actual indication they think that at all. If someone describes a rectangle, you wouldn’t assume they mean a square.
logantuc t1_jaeax92 wrote
Reply to comment by alabasterwilliams in ‘cruelty-free’ circus replaced animals with holograms by davster39
Yeah but that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea lmao
logantuc t1_jaeam7b wrote
Reply to comment by WhiskeyAndKisses in ‘cruelty-free’ circus replaced animals with holograms by davster39
Doesn’t mean he likes animals being abused or thinks they should continue doing circuses at all.
logantuc t1_jadzgh3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ‘cruelty-free’ circus replaced animals with holograms by davster39
Who said that? Definitely not that guy you’re replying to.
logantuc t1_jaef6en wrote
Reply to comment by WhiskeyAndKisses in ‘cruelty-free’ circus replaced animals with holograms by davster39
My point is that it’s not. But whatever. Nowhere is there an indication that the original thing is better than the current thing, only that the current thing is bad. I’m open to being wrong if you can show me otherwise.