littleteacup77
littleteacup77 t1_j632ioa wrote
From what I’ve gathered is that she’s not a very good writer but is also one of the most popular writers right now because of tik tok. Her books are front and centre on displays in book stores, she’s on the bestseller list etc. I think that normally when a writer is mediocre/bad and not very popular most people just let them be but when they get to this level of fame, they are bound to be scrutinized and people will talk shit about them.
littleteacup77 t1_j2eubm3 wrote
Reply to Do you think it's valid to adapt a book to a movie/series, insert a modern political agenda and change story? by SpecialistHot7416
Every adaptation will change the material in some way. What’s the reason for adapting a property in the first place if not to imbue some new meaning into it? If you take months and millions of dollars to adapt a story without breathing some new life into it, what’s the purpose? You might as well let the original stand by itself and not touch it. It’s like when an artist covers a song - the most interesting covers are the ones that have their own personal stamp on it.
It’s really up to you if you like the changes or not. If you think the story is perfect the way it is and doesn’t need any updating, that’s a valid opinion to have. For example, I love Disney’s “The Lion King” and won’t watch the new version because I don’t see the purpose in remaking the cartoon almost shot for shot when the original is already great.
littleteacup77 t1_j658w3n wrote
Reply to comment by headinthetreesnowher in Why are Colleen Hoover books so divisive? by sunnywatermelon18
Stephanie Meyer got a lot of hate back in the day as well, maybe even more than Colleen Hoover tbh