littlesymphonicdispl

littlesymphonicdispl t1_jcledi6 wrote

Guy i played high school football with got recruited by Pitt to play LT, because in high school he was 6'6 and 300lbs or so.

He was also absolute dogshit and never played in college. I was a backup linebacker and during our practices I'd line up at Defensive End against him specifically because I knew it'd increase my chances of playing, because I'd burn him off the snap every. Single. Play.

You can't coach size, so coaches go nuts for it, but having size doesn't mean they'll ever be able to coach you into becoming a decent player

2

littlesymphonicdispl t1_is86dfd wrote

>or inspired someone to use violence,

Oh we can make sweeping claims that were incapable of proving?

Lmao your opinion doesn't matter you're a plant by (insert entity) paid to do (insert task)!

Fucking lmao. Do yourself a favor and close reddit for the day, I don't want you overworking the few braincells left.

1

littlesymphonicdispl t1_is7eso9 wrote

My standard is using more than a single braincell to parse what someone says. Context and connotation are well defined concepts, and they're covering that exact thing you describe as seemingly a magical ability to pick up on what people mean.

−2

littlesymphonicdispl t1_is6jjh6 wrote

You're suggesting that because fight doesn't necessarily mean physical violence it's wrong to make that assumption. If that's not what you're suggesting, you need to edit your comments, because that's what they say.

That's a laughable notion.

1

littlesymphonicdispl t1_is6ezv2 wrote

>The word fight is exclusively reserved for physical violence

No, and that's their entire point? That's encouraging people to fight without a direct call for violence.

Congratulations on making their argument for them.

7