lilemphazyma t1_j3hrmnl wrote on January 8, 2023 at 5:52 PM Reply to Anna Alexandrova, a philosopher of science at Cambridge, argues that a “science of happiness” is possible but requires a new approach. Measures such as “life satisfaction” or “positive emotions” can be studied rigorously. An underlying variable of “happiness” cannot. by Ma3Ke4Li3 It is foolish in the first place to regard happiness as chiefly important or our primary goal/purpose. Placing your happiness as your primary goal will almost insure your unhappiness Permalink 0
lilemphazyma t1_j3hrmnl wrote
Reply to Anna Alexandrova, a philosopher of science at Cambridge, argues that a “science of happiness” is possible but requires a new approach. Measures such as “life satisfaction” or “positive emotions” can be studied rigorously. An underlying variable of “happiness” cannot. by Ma3Ke4Li3
It is foolish in the first place to regard happiness as chiefly important or our primary goal/purpose. Placing your happiness as your primary goal will almost insure your unhappiness