landyhill
landyhill t1_j5pewyc wrote
Reply to comment by maretus in CNET's AI Journalist Appears to Have Committed Extensive Plagiarism by iingot
IMHO it ignores the spirit of copyright or trademark which should be something as a whole that is truly unique. I recall Apple wanting to trademark rounded corners on phones or something similar. Or an artist trying to copyright chord progressions which on their own do very little.
AI images, coding and writing is impacting people who feel what they do has some intrinsic value that only they can provide using a specific process they utilize.
We all build on our experiences of what we hear, read, see, touch, etc. I think the term "create" is misleading. Humans build using physical resources here long before our individual existence. Outside of the occasional meteor everything is basically recycled into a new form.
AI is coming for the mental aspect of humanity reducing us to ones and zeros and our egos may have a hard time adjusting.
landyhill t1_j5o9l43 wrote
Reply to comment by maretus in CNET's AI Journalist Appears to Have Committed Extensive Plagiarism by iingot
This is how you avoid overdraft fees
You avoid overdraft fees this is how
Overdraft fees this is how you avoid!
Is this how you avoid overdraft fees.
Avoid fees overdraft how is this you?
Is overdraft fees you? Avoid this how?
Fees overdraft, you avoid, this is how!
landyhill t1_j5rdgcq wrote
Reply to comment by maretus in CNET's AI Journalist Appears to Have Committed Extensive Plagiarism by iingot
In general I agree with you. Imagine someone claiming plagiarism for the terms like "Click here for more information" or "Stock market reaches all time high".