koberulz_24
koberulz_24 t1_jacuz41 wrote
Reply to comment by NickSalvo in Are there any movies that use fundamental movie making mistakes as plot devices? by concept_I
Kubrick breaks the 180° rule, too, which is even more directly related to the OP.
koberulz_24 t1_j5b1x8f wrote
Reply to comment by Existing365Chocolate in Looking for movies with a dramatically different director’s cut by pornthrowaway1421
It's available on the Blu-ray, has been for years.
koberulz_24 t1_j5b1qvp wrote
Reply to comment by K1NG_94 in Looking for movies with a dramatically different director’s cut by pornthrowaway1421
Yeah, there's only ever been one cut.
koberulz_24 t1_j5b1pjd wrote
Reply to comment by woman_noises in Looking for movies with a dramatically different director’s cut by pornthrowaway1421
This never happened. There's only one cut of Prometheus.
koberulz_24 t1_j2d38fg wrote
Reply to comment by AlanMorlock in Tomorrow is Public Domain Day in the US. What newly in the public domain movie will you be watching in 2023? by cv5cv6
For everything other than film, yes. But the expense of restoring film to look its best means it does actually benefit in a meaningful way. With a book, the words are the same regardless of how they're printed, and any complete copy of the book will give you enough to produce a perfect version no matter how crumpled or stained it might be.
koberulz_24 t1_j2d2wq0 wrote
Reply to comment by AlanMorlock in Tomorrow is Public Domain Day in the US. What newly in the public domain movie will you be watching in 2023? by cv5cv6
Or Detour. Sure. But it's easier to manage as an occasional thing than it being their entire output. Even more so for labels where prestige and extras aren't a selling point.
Plus it'd be a return to the silent days where storing archival material is a waste of money because there's no future profit potential, so negatives would be junked and films would be lost at a far higher rate.
koberulz_24 t1_j2d2e3j wrote
Reply to comment by AlanMorlock in Tomorrow is Public Domain Day in the US. What newly in the public domain movie will you be watching in 2023? by cv5cv6
Yes, but would they bother doing anything if a public domain label could just put the same film out for much cheaper?
koberulz_24 t1_j2cyn8z wrote
Reply to comment by AlanMorlock in Tomorrow is Public Domain Day in the US. What newly in the public domain movie will you be watching in 2023? by cv5cv6
Does it though? Look at everything put out by Warner Archive, Criterion, Eureka, etc. Imagine none of that exists...
koberulz_24 t1_j2cv2la wrote
Reply to comment by cv5cv6 in Tomorrow is Public Domain Day in the US. What newly in the public domain movie will you be watching in 2023? by cv5cv6
That said, as someone argued on Blu-ray.com the fact that they're still covered by copyright means there's an incentive for studios and labels to put the effort into restorations that allow them to look as good as possible. If they were public domain we'd be putting up with blurry, scratched, nth-generation prints.
koberulz_24 t1_iud33bm wrote
Reply to Why can't Terminator 2 be considered one of the greatest movie of all time ? by SavingsService2138
OP has a post in the Star Wars sub asking if he's the only one who watches the OT.
Troll?
koberulz_24 t1_jacwh3x wrote
Reply to comment by microwavedhottakes in At what point is a spoiler no longer required to be kept under wraps? by microwavedhottakes
Heck, where I am Aftersun is only just starting to hit cinemas.