kilkonie
kilkonie t1_j5ywe8q wrote
Reply to ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent
That means it's not plagiarism when I use its work as it's not an author. Nice!
kilkonie t1_ixiq94r wrote
Reply to HP Inc. is cutting up to 6,000 employees as it becomes the latest tech company to announce major layoffs by Awkwardtree
To be clear: HP has been shedding 1-2k people annually for years. This 6k employees will be spread over three years and will be spread across the globe. Not to downplay the global economic situation, but many of these layoffs were planned and timed to minimally impact stock.
kilkonie t1_j5z1gcf wrote
Reply to comment by marketrent in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent
Of course. As a human that interacts with a limited set of like-minded people, my own writing has the potential to amplify social biases like sexism and racism that aligns to my own bubble of friends. I also have a tendency to produce “plausible bullshit” — incorrect information presented as fact. (See, for example, most of my high school papers.)
My point was that if I can't cite the output of ChatGPT as the actual author of the content, then I simply must take it upon myself to deal with the repercussions of publishing crap work, wherever it came from.