kensingtonGore

kensingtonGore t1_jaqc6q5 wrote

>It's not like any of the last presidents were physicists or engineers who would be able to lend insight into the situation

Right, lets not tell the commander and chief about the impossible things recorded by credible witnesses flying with impunity over american missile facilities. And certainly don't tell him about the paper trail and opinion of the former UAP director regarding 'recovered materials.' That's none of his business...

imo, I completely disagree, all of humanity is owed the knowledge, not just a select few the military deems appropriate.

​

> it was just talking to pilots and collecting details/anecdotes

There might be no link at all. Maybe it's a co-incidence that the US military suddenly, and for no rational reason began funding anti gravity, memory metals, and fusion research in the early 1950s. Just a few years after Trinity. And they're still at it, they just funded 8 universities last week for LENR (aka cold fusion) research.

Why are they intent on studying these fields which are so scientifically unfounded that they are/were almost taboo to study seriously? For 75 years? What do they have to show for that multi-trillion dollar investment?

They know alot more than they say, and they're not sharing observations, or materials which could be studied at greater speed in public. Even the prosaic things.

What's the motivation at this point?

1

kensingtonGore t1_jak55ji wrote

This interview is fairly recent, and breaks it down in Fravors own words, which is nice.

But there's also this forensic analysis, it goes deep into the velocities and g forces reported, and covers the sensors used. The fact that the UAP were detected on multiple platforms, over multiple days from multiple credible witnesses is why I think that event cluster is the gold standard for study.

It's not enough to be conclusive, but that's because I think we struggle to record it. Still deserves a closer look I think

1

kensingtonGore t1_jak3sfo wrote

So there are a ton of rabbit holes, hoaxes and bullshitters in the ufo world.

To cut through all of the chaff, I have been using the same criteria as the pentagons office to decide what is actually unexplained, what is prosaic.

One of the criteria is low observability, which as you say - concealing themselves would make sense if they are here to survey.

0

kensingtonGore t1_jajrd2w wrote

Im enjoying the snark, but you have a point.

The thing is, despite how you feel on the topic, billions of dollars that you pay into have been spent on researching this, and its related programs - compounding for 75 years. None of it is accounted for in the DoD budget, which as never passed an audit.

Seems like a waste, and maybe there should be some people speaking out about this colossal waste of resources. Its enough money to solve the homelessness problem in America.

Why?

Unless there was proof that something going on, why for 75 years?

0

kensingtonGore t1_jajf0nw wrote

The thing is it has been looked into for 75 years, but there's no information forthcoming.

The latest legal changes have been an effort to get that information released to the public, but also to our own government who is not completely aware of what's going on, (according to the people who run the government intelligent agencies.)

Information is apparently being held back from the office of the president.

0

kensingtonGore t1_jajehkz wrote

Really what they mean is that Biden needs to pressure and support the existing investigation done by the all domain anomalous resolution office in the pentagon.

They're having trouble with the Air Force who is not complying with the legal mandates.

Even in these balloon shoot down events, the Air Force is at odds with what the white house wants to say

2