jeoeker531
jeoeker531 t1_iui40bf wrote
Reply to comment by r3b3l-tech in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Yes companies just want profit, but in capitalism, for companies to make profit and remain competitive they have to have quality and adhere to some degree to what customers want. If people don’t like what a company is doing the company will lose money. Unfortunately when the government gets involved it corrupts and degrades the free market and capitalism
jeoeker531 t1_iui005z wrote
Reply to comment by elencus in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
It’s not though, clear cutting forests isn’t bad if it’s done responsibly and trees are replanted, which they are
jeoeker531 t1_iuhn931 wrote
Reply to comment by Acrobatic-Rate4271 in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
We do… the US has more trees now than it did 100 years ago
jeoeker531 t1_iuhmkog wrote
Reply to comment by elencus in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Because someone made it seem like it’s only bad
jeoeker531 t1_iuhmisj wrote
Reply to comment by cnnrduncan in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
No, because while we are animals ourselves we also have morals and society. The point is, our bodies are literally designed to eat meat
jeoeker531 t1_iuhmfwx wrote
Reply to comment by r3b3l-tech in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Yep, but you have to find specific examples of this not working. It can and does work… finding exceptions to the rule doesn’t mean it doesn’t work
jeoeker531 t1_iuhm3yc wrote
Reply to comment by sloopslarp in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Actually as of 2020 plankton numbers have been booming, not diminishing
jeoeker531 t1_iuhlo9i wrote
Reply to comment by happygloaming in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
We were always going to die… everyone dies
jeoeker531 t1_iudp4oh wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Where did I say there wasn’t a problem? Can you find that for me?
jeoeker531 t1_iudp2hd wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
I didn’t go into anything specific or any details, I simply said that trees are renewable resources. Which is objectively true
jeoeker531 t1_iudoyv8 wrote
Reply to comment by sloopslarp in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
The ocean STILL producing that even now, however bad it is at the moment. Also the ocean is extremely vast
jeoeker531 t1_iudm7qy wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
How much does the comparison of oxygen production matter when the vast majority of oxygen production isn’t been due to trees?
jeoeker531 t1_iudm3x8 wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Didn’t know you were the tree farm professor. You’re talking out your ass
jeoeker531 t1_iudjcnm wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
The point is that trees are renewable resources and that even that 1’ wide tree will grow into the 10’ tree
jeoeker531 t1_iudj5nh wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Why are we looking at what one individual tree does when we have data for all the trees? For millions of trees?
jeoeker531 t1_iudhs1j wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Trees don’t make 30% of oxygen either. The corn belt in the USA at its height of the year makes more oxygen then the Amazon. And nobodies cutting down all trees not even close. In fact there there are more trees in the US now then there were 100 years ago.
jeoeker531 t1_iudh31g wrote
Reply to comment by elencus in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
I mean clear cutting trees isn’t inherently bad either. Again, they’re reusable and can be planted elsewhere. Clear cutting in certain areas isn’t bad. Indiscriminately clear cutting everywhere would be bad
jeoeker531 t1_iudgt54 wrote
Reply to comment by NemeshisuEM in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Not so severe when you can replace it. Trees are replaceable. And supplies of one thing aren’t as vital as supplies as others. So fucking up 30% of something might not always be a big deal. Trees are reusable and don’t provide the majority of oxygen
jeoeker531 t1_iud9wuo wrote
Reply to comment by Traditional-Trip7617 in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Yep planktons in the ocean contribute to about 70% of earths oxygen
jeoeker531 t1_iud9sx0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Why? Animals do that to eachother. It’s literally nature. Our bodies are actually designed to eat meat
jeoeker531 t1_iud9q4z wrote
Reply to comment by elencus in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Ok I never said it was the only benefit of forests. I’m just saying, again, that cutting down trees isn’t bad when done responsibly. It’s a reusable resource
jeoeker531 t1_iud01a4 wrote
Reply to comment by brockwallace in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
That’s not what I said… I’m just saying that it’s not so harmful or detrimental that trees are cut down responsibly. They are a reusable resource. Also the corn belt in the USA in season provides more oxygen than the Amazon too
jeoeker531 t1_iucyodv wrote
Reply to comment by brockwallace in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Remember that over 70% of our oxygen comes from the ocean, not forests
Lmao who’s downvoting this? It’s simply a fact
jeoeker531 t1_iuieqkq wrote
Reply to comment by Acrobatic-Rate4271 in Ozone Hole Continues Shrinking in 2022, NASA and NOAA Scientists Say | Annual Antarctic ozone hole over the South Pole was slightly smaller than last year and generally continued the overall shrinking trend of recent years. by yourSAS
Regardless there’s a net gain of trees on earth