jeho22
jeho22 t1_je8agxh wrote
Reply to comment by Hillz44 in First cheetah cubs born in India since extinction 70 years ago by thethpunjabi
It used to be accepted that extinction of a species occurred with the death of the last member of that spices that represented a chance of reproduction in the wild. That being said, definitions of words change over time, same as trends and social norms. Things just change. And we eventually rewrite the definitions to accommodate that.
I don't think that it is particularly wrong to say an animal can be extinct in one region, while existing in another, but it it most definitly confusing to somebody who uses the traditionally accepted definition of extinct. It's much more concise to say that cheetahs disappeared entirely from the region, and only approximately 100 of their particular subspecies exist in the wild somewhere else. In fact, I would say that using the word 'extinct' in the way it is used in this post is most likely intentionally missleading- tho I appreciate that it is probably being done so to bring attention to an issue that I also believe needs to be taken more seriously be humanity on the whole.
jeho22 t1_je89bz4 wrote
Reply to comment by _music_mongrel in First cheetah cubs born in India since extinction 70 years ago by thethpunjabi
My dog just left my living room and is now in the garage. Is it safe to say that dogs are now extinct in my living room?
jeho22 t1_jazg6pf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in New UN brokered High Seas Treaty Places 30% of Ocean into protected areas by 2030 after decades of talks by AstroEngineer314
I think this is more of a wording issue...
The ocean and its ecosystems are being damaged horribly. The ocean also is not a species that can go extinct.
Also, since when does anybody listen to the UN? Think China's fleets are going to magically start playing nice? Are countries going to stop dumping their garbGe and sewage into their rivers?
Probably not in my lifetime
Edit: left out the word 'go'
jeho22 t1_j76xxl3 wrote
Reply to comment by SpiderFacade in Scientists made a new kind of ice that might exist on distant moons by technical_404
This is fair
jeho22 t1_j762ps7 wrote
So then... it's not new
jeho22 t1_j6f4y5s wrote
Reply to Scientists lower price of lithium's best competition - flow batteries - by 20%. Makes the battery effectively equal to or cheaper than lithium ion when spread over 30 years (flow battery lifetimes are effectively infinite with light repowering efforts). by PorkyPigDid911
Maybe they can work on lowering the price of eggs next
jeho22 t1_j224mqb wrote
Reply to comment by Arb0k in A re-usable crisp box and diet coke cup in a French McDonalds by blackjack_beans
And the audacity of them all to pronounce 'b' like 'be'!
jeho22 t1_j20cw7t wrote
Reply to comment by AryaNunya in NASA mulls SpaceX backup plan for crew of Russia’s leaky Soyuz ship by jivatman
Only if they don't have loved ones
jeho22 t1_j20cd4m wrote
Reply to Some day soon we might be making popcorn with infrared poppers | It's fast, energy efficient, environmentally friendly compared to conventional heating by chrisdh79
Finally, the once in a life time scientific breakthrough I've been waiting for
jeho22 t1_je8bjmf wrote
Reply to comment by _music_mongrel in First cheetah cubs born in India since extinction 70 years ago by thethpunjabi
OK... if I have an indoor cat, and an outdoor cat, and the indoor cat dies... indoor cats are now extinct in my house, yes?
I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be a brat. But I feel that using this term, that has historically been used to represent the end of a species forever, in this way that focuses on regional populations instead, will only degrade the seriousness of 'extinction' to the public in general. Pushing extinction this way in social media will only dull people's reaction to it in the long run. And there's already a word for what this is trying to do anyway, extirpation. But people on social media don't know that word, so well here we are ;)
Call it regional extinction, or locally extinct, and we'll all on the same page at least.